The ruling by the British Columbia Supreme Court in the <a data-evt-val="{&quot;control_fields&quot;: {&quot;mparticle&quot;: {&quot;keys&quot;: {&quot;click_source_type&quot;: &quot;click_source_type&quot;, &quot;anchor_text&quot;: &quot;anchor_text&quot;, &quot;target_url&quot;: &quot;target_url&quot;, &quot;layout_section&quot;: &quot;layout_section&quot;}, &quot;mp_event_type&quot;: &quot;Navigation&quot;, &quot;extra_keys&quot;: [&quot;click_vertical_position_percentage&quot;, &quot;click_vertical_position_pixels&quot;]}}, &quot;click_source_type&quot;: &quot;in-page link&quot;, &quot;anchor_text&quot;: &quot;Cowichan Tribes case&quot;, &quot;target_url&quot;: &quot;https://canlii.ca/t/kdq92&quot;, &quot;layout_section&quot;: &quot;in-page-link&quot;}" data-evt="click" data-evt-typ="click" href="https://canlii.ca/t/kdq92">Cowichan Tribes case</a> earlier this month highlights just how many legal rules on constitutionally protected Aboriginal title remain unresolved and how much of a problem those legal gaps create.

The B.C. Supreme Court's Cowichan Tribes judgment has cast a shadow of doubt over land ownership. There are ways to get clarity, though{ai:summary}BC Supreme Court ruling in the Cowichan Tribes case shows many rules on constitutionally protected Aboriginal title remain unresolved.Gaps in the law fuel uncertainty in rights and land disputes. #politics

Dwight Newman: Aboriginal title's conflict with private property must be resolved

Loading...