US special council Jack Smith filed a brief with the DC Court of Appeals Saturday, December 30. In this latest document, Smith asks for a “review of the order of the district court (Chutkan, J.) denying his motions to dismiss based on Presidential immunity and principles of double jeopardy.”

“Immunity from criminal prosecution would be particularly dangerous, where, as here, the former President is alleged to have engaged in criminal conduct aimed at overturning the results of [an] election,” <a href="https://www.libertynation.com/jack-smiths-latest-bid-to-silence-trump-will-the-judge-play-ball/">Smith</a> argued. At <strong><em>Liberty Nation</em></strong>, we believe you should have access to these documents without all the spin. As such, we republish Smith’s latest filing here for you to READ IN FULL:

<a style="text-decoration: underline;" title="View Jack Smith New Filing on Scribd" href="https://www.scribd.com/document/695720867/Jack-Smith-New-Filing#from_embed">Jack Smith New Filing</a> by <a style="text-decoration: underline;" title="View Liberty Nation's profile on Scribd" href="https://www.scribd.com/user/388454695/Liberty-Nation#from_embed">Liberty Nation</a> on Scribd

Jack Smith filed with the court, arguing that validating Trump's claim of immunity would be dangerous - read the full filing here.{ai:summary}<p>US special council Jack Smith has filed a brief with the DC Court of Appeals, requesting a review of the district court's denial of his motions to dismiss based on Presidential immunity and double jeopardy principles. Smith argues that immunity from criminal prosecution would be dangerous, especially in a case where the former President is accused of criminal conduct aimed at overturning election results. #politics</p>

Jack Smith’s New Brief Calls Trump Immunity Dangerous – READ IN FULL - Liberty Nation News

Loading...