THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Aug 3, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
Huffington Post
HuffPost
15 Feb 2025


NextImg:Law Professor Spots Televised 'Quid Pro Quo' Moment Between Eric Adams And White House
LOADINGERROR LOADING

New York University law professor Ryan Goodman says the alleged “quid pro quo” arrangement between New York City Mayor Eric Adams and President Donald Trump’s administration was captured Friday in broad daylight — when the legally embattled mayor appeared on national television.

Adams was indicted in September on allegations he accepted bribes and illegal campaign contributions, but went on to curry favor with Trump by working with him on immigration. On Monday, the Department of Justice ordered federal prosecutors to drop the charges.

The directive from acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove argued that Adams’ case should be dropped so the mayor could continue to help the Trump administration enforce its immigration policy.

A few days earlier, Adams and Tom Homan, Trump’s border czar, had a curious exchange on Fox News.

During an appearance Friday on “Fox & Friends,” Homan said: “If [Adams] doesn’t come through, I’ll be back in New York City, and we won’t be sitting on the couch. I’ll be in his office, up his butt, saying, ‘Where the hell is the agreement we came to?’”

Goodman, who previously served as special counsel at the Defense Department, argued Friday on CNN’s “OutFront” that Homan thus unwittingly exposed the rumored deal on television — and said, “This is the quid pro quo. It seems like this is the implicit threat.”

Goodman then essentially parsed through Homan’s statement.

Adams has sought to curry favor with Trump, particularly by working with him on immigration.
Adams has sought to curry favor with Trump, particularly by working with him on immigration.
Left: Alex Brandon/Associated Press; Right: Yuki Iwamura/Associated Press

If you don’t come through on your part of the agreement,” Goodman said of Homan’s implicit threat, “I’m coming back to claim what we have, which is that we have submitted to the court that the case is still strong, and we’re asking the court to dismiss it, but not to throw it completely away.”

Go Ad-Free — And Protect The Free Press

The next four years will change America forever. But HuffPost won't back down when it comes to providing free and impartial journalism.

For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience to qualifying contributors who support our fearless newsroom. We hope you'll join us.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest — we could use your help again. We won't back down from our mission of providing free, fair news during this critical moment. But we can't do it without you.

For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience. to qualifying contributors who support our fearless journalism. We hope you'll join us.

You've supported HuffPost before, and we'll be honest — we could use your help again. We won't back down from our mission of providing free, fair news during this critical moment. But we can't do it without you.

For the first time, we're offering an ad-free experience. to qualifying contributors who support our fearless journalism. We hope you'll join us.

Support HuffPost

Goodman argued that the order from Bove, rather than rewarding Adams for cooperating with Trump, is “actually weaponization to keep the case hovering” above Adams’ head.

The order specifically noted that the DOJ could bring the same charges against Adams at some point in the future.

Goodman’s assessment left CNN anchor Erin Burnett stunned. “It’s an incredible moment that we are in.”