[Want even more content from FPM? Sign up for FPM+ to unlock exclusive series, virtual town-halls with our authors, and more—now for just $3.99/month. Click here to sign up.]

Since 2023, five American citizens have been killed in Israel and the West Bank under murky circumstances. While each death is a tragedy, the broader pattern raises serious questions about whether these incidents are organically occurring tragedies or carefully staged provocations designed to advance a political agenda. The Regavim Movement’s April 2025 report, False Flags and Real Agendas, provides a framework that helps contextualize these deaths within the broader machinery of anti-Israel lawfare and narrative manipulation.

CAIR’s Media Campaign

Following the death of Sayfollah “Saif” Musallet, representatives of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) appeared on television news broadcasts at least eleven times within a week. In each of these appearances, CAIR provided no new information about the case, instead offering a mix of emotional rhetoric, speculative accusations, and calls for federal investigations. Their commentary emphasized concern for the treatment of American citizens abroad—concern notably absent in their silence over American hostages held by Hamas. CAIR’s selective outrage underscores a pattern: American identity is weaponized when it can be used to undermine Israel, and disregarded when it might challenge Hamas or other Islamic actors.

Regavim Report: Staged Provocations and Fabricated Violence

The report by the Regavim Movement details how many reports of “settler violence” are actually propaganda to pressure Israel financially, and diplomatically, as well as the United States.

CAIR’s media campaign fits right into this pattern.

The Regavim report exposes how Palestinian operatives, often in coordination with foreign and Israeli far-left activists, deliberately stage confrontations and vandalism, including fake “Price Tag” attacks, in order to manipulate public perception and provoke media condemnation.

In the South Hebron Hills, Arab field operatives have:

Specific Examples from the Report

The Victims

Pattern Recognition: Signs of Staging

Coinciding “Settler Attacks” and International Pressure

In January 2025, following President Trump’s reversal of Biden-era sanctions targeting “extremist” settlers, alleged “settler attacks” on Palestinian villages were widely reported. These reports, primarily sourced from Palestinian authorities and NGOs such as Yesh Din and B’Tselem, emerged almost immediately after policy changes—leading to widespread media coverage. The rapid timing and geographic implausibility of coordinated settler attacks across multiple villages raise significant doubts about the authenticity of these incidents. These events coincided with a coordinated international pressure campaign by the EU, UN, and certain U.S. factions seeking to reinstate sanctions and amplify criticism of Israeli policies. The EU specifically signaled potential trade suspensions and sanctions reviews to increase diplomatic pressure.

Indicators of Narrative Manipulation:

Pre-positioned Media Coverage:

Several outlets—including The Guardian, Time, and Al Jazeera—had detailed articles prepared and published within hours of the supposed settler attacks and Trump’s reversal. The speed and coherence of this international media rollout suggest the stories may have been pre-written in anticipation of a policy change, rather than the result of real-time reporting.

No Forensic or Independent Confirmation:

The “attacks” that allegedly occurred right after the reversal were primarily reported by:

Geographically Implausible Coordination:

The attacks were reported to have occurred across multiple villages (e.g., Qusra, al-Mughayyir, Turmus Ayya) within a short timeframe—suggesting a level of coordination unlikely from disparate, unconnected “extremist settlers.” If true, this would imply a nationwide mobilization within hours, yet no group claimed responsibility, and no coordinated movement was documented by Israeli intelligence.

This raises the possibility that the attacks were exaggerated, or opportunistically reported to coincide with Trump’s policy move.

International Pressure Campaigns Surrounding Musallet’s Death

Conclusion

There is no question that each death is a personal loss. But the pattern surrounding these incidents suggests strategic exploitation rather than random tragedy. Whether these Americans were knowingly inserted into dangerous situations, or their deaths were simply co-opted, the effect is the same: the weaponization of grief to delegitimize Israel. Until independent, verifiable investigations are the standard—not NGO press releases or PA talking points—the narrative of “settler violence” must be viewed with deep skepticism.