


[Order Daniel Greenfield’s new pamphlet, ‘107 Horrible Days: The Real Story of the Kamala Campaign’: HERE.]
Kamala Harris has a 2028 problem. It’s bigger than her past support for castrating illegal alien criminals at taxpayer expense or calling for an end to private health insurance.
The problem is the 178 lb man senile 82-year-old whom she backed in the 2024 election.
In her book ‘107 Days’, Kamala tries to have it both ways, protesting that she only lost because Biden dropped out too late for her to have a real chance to campaign, but also standing by her past defenses of Biden as fit to run. Someone should have told him to drop out, she insists, but it couldn’t be her because she was too self-interested. But not too self-interested to replace him.
Kamala’s book launch is supposed to redeem her, but instead it damns her. Kamala claimed that she was too “loyal” to tell Biden to drop out or to distance herself from him, but a loyal VP wouldn’t have written a campaign memoir taking shots at Biden for not doing enough for her.
Over a year after the big Biden lie collapsed, Kamala is still trying to hedge and defend Biden’s mental acuity, but it’s not because she’s loyal to him. ‘107 Days’ is filled with complaints about Biden, not his mental state, but how he and his “inner circle” weren’t supportive enough of her.
At one point, Kamala (or her ghostwriter) puts a rant into her husband’s mouth, denouncing the Bidens. “They hide you away for four years, give you impossible, s__t jobs, don’t correct the record when those tasks are mischaracterized, never fight back when you’re attacked, never praise your accomplishments, and, now, they want you out there on that balcony, standing right behind them. Now, finally, they know you are an asset, and they need you to reassure the American people. And still, they have to ask if we’re loyal?”
They don’t have to ask because Kamala isn’t. ‘107 Days’ shows her instead as whiny, entitled and eager to take shots at everyone from Biden to potential 2028 opponents like Newsom, who never called her back, Josh Shapiro, whom she accuses of asking for too many details about life as VP, and Buttigieg, whom she suggests is too gay for a racist and homophobic country.
Biden’s problem, according to Kamala, wasn’t that he was mentally unfit, but that he didn’t appreciate her enough. That’s not a compelling problem to anyone who isn’t Kamala.
But if Kamala isn’t loyal, why did she let the trainwreck go forward? The obvious answer is because she wanted the 2024 nomination and she knew that the only way she was going to get it was if Biden were forced to drop out and the party had no time to do anything but elevate her.
What that really means is that ‘107 Days’ isn’t an excuse: it was her plan or hope all along.
Kamala needs Democrats to believe that she had a foreshortened campaign unwillingly thrust on her because of matters beyond her control, but she was all too willing. Had she pushed Biden to drop out earlier, there would have been a competitive primary and she wouldn’t have gotten Biden’s endorsement. Avoiding both required waiting until there were ‘107 Days’ left.
The dog chasing the car caught it and then didn’t know what to do with it except waste an incredible fortune, reinvent her campaign and identity several times over, then hang out with Oprah while remaining certain that the country would support her for no apparent reason.
That’s the real story of the campaign, the one we tell in ‘107 Horrible Days: The Real Story of the Kamala Campaign’: the new pamphlet from the David Horowitz Freedom Center showing the actual truth about the worst campaign in history. Kamala wants everyone to think it’s not her fault, it’s the fault of Biden’s inner circle who, she claims, were also very, very mean to her.
But it is her fault. Kamala clumsily played ‘Game of Thrones’ but couldn’t keep the throne. Now she wants another shot at it, after blowing the last one, because the crisis she helped create by propping up the lie that Biden was functional for her own personal gain gave her less time.
Kamala can’t admit that Biden was senile because then she’d be admitting her guilt. Now that she’s facing the prospect of a competitive primary in 2028, she certainly can’t admit that she would have come in dead last in a 2024 primary. She wants to convince her party that after losing one presidential election, she’s fit to run again because she was unable to make the one crucial decision that she had the opportunity to make in her entire vice presidential career.
That’s the worst sales pitch ever.
Some of this would at least be defensible if she actually had been loyal to Biden. Picking your boss over your party and country isn’t exactly the stuff of presidential timber, more likely war crimes trials, but at least there would have been some shred of nobility there. Instead, Kamala shreds Biden proving that she propped him up because of her self-interest, not his interests.
The only portrait that emerges from ‘107 Days’ is of someone so selfish that they’re a black hole of narcissism. Kamala constantly rages at the Biden administration for not praising her enough. Her most traumatic moment is losing the presidential election. “It says a lot about how traumatized we both were by what happened that night that Doug and I never discussed it with each other until I sat down to write this book,” she reveals in her campaign memoir.
As bad as some of her predecessors were, I don’t recall any of them describing a political defeat as so traumatizing that she had to all but recover memories to write her campaign memoir.
107 Days’ is a narcissist’s whine into the void. Kamala Harris spent her entire life being told she was special and destined for great things for reasons that no one has been able to justify. After wrecking her party, her administration and the hopes and dreams of her donors and voters, she makes no apologies, finds no fault with herself, but doubles down on being all about herself.