Topline
The White House holds a “high degree of confidence” U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities “obliterated” the country’s nuclear program, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Monday, despite conflicting comments from Vice President JD Vance, military officials and nuclear watchdogs.
Trump claimed Iran’s nuclear sites sustained “monumental damage,” while other administration ... More
Leavitt told ABC News the U.S. is “confident” Iran’s nuclear program was “completely and totally obliterated,” noting there is a “high degree of confidence” the locations the U.S. strikes took place is where Iran stored its enriched uranium and that Iran “no longer [has] the capability … to threaten the world.”
President Donald Trump claimed Saturday that Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities were “completely and totally obliterated,” adding late Sunday Iran’s nuclear site sustained “monumental damage.”
International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi appeared to dispute Trump’s claims in a statement Monday by suggesting the agency would need to verify damage to Iran’s underground Fordow facility, including whether the site’s uranium enrichment halls were impacted, though he noted the U.S. strikes likely caused “very significant” damage.
On Sunday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said an assessment on damage to Iran’s nuclear sites was “still pending,” and Caine claimed it was “way too early for me to comment on what may or may not still be there.”
Vance, in an interview with ABC on Sunday, suggested the U.S. strikes only set back Iran’s potential to weaponize its uranium stockpile and said the U.S. was “going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel.”
Jeffrey Lewis, a professor of nonproliferation at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey, wrote on X he was “unimpressed” by the U.S. strikes while citing satellite images of the attacks, claiming the U.S. “failed to target significant elements of Iran’s nuclear materials and production infrastructure.”
Iran stored about 400 kilograms (about 881 pounds) of uranium enriched to 60%, near weapons-grade enrichment of 90%, according to Grossi. It’s unclear whether Iran’s uranium stockpile is still this large, Grossi noted, adding IAEA’s inspectors last verified Iran’s stockpile a “few days” before Iran’s conflict with Israel began earlier this month.
Whether Iran moved its uranium stockpile before the U.S. strikes. Grossi said Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi notified him on June 13—the day Israel launched airstrikes at Iran—that Iran would adopt unspecified “special measures to protect our nuclear equipment and materials.” Iran is required to disclose whether its nuclear materials are transferred to another facility, Grossi said, though he did not specify whether Iran had done so. Grossi reportedly said he requested IAEA’s inspectors to return to Iran’s sites to “account for the stockpiles of uranium.”
Trump announced Saturday the U.S. attacked Iran’s nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. The mission, with the codename “Operation Midnight Hammer,” was a “precision operation” that targeted Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Hegseth said. The strikes followed weeks of the Trump administration pushing for Iran to end its nuclear program before a conflict escalated between Iran and Israel. Shortly after the strikes, Trump warned Iran against retaliating, claiming, “There will either be peace or there will be tragedy for Iran.” Vance echoed Trump’s call for peace and said the U.S. was “not at war with Iran, we’re at war with Iran’s nuclear program.” Taragchi accused the U.S. of an “unprecedented violation” of the UN’s founding charter and international law, arguing Trump was “abusing our commitment to diplomacy.”