THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 21, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
Forbes
Forbes
25 Jul 2024


California state agencies will begin removing homeless encampments under a new executive order from Gov. Gavin Newsom, multiple news outlets reported Thursday—the most high profile response yet to a June Supreme Court decision that allowed governments to crack down on homeless campers.

Governor Gavin Newsom is set to be inaugurated for a second term on Friday, Jan. 6, and the preparations for the ceremony are underway in downtown Sacramento.

Newsom's order applies only to state agencies, but many localities have announced separate plans to ... [+] crack down on encampments.

Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Newsom’s executive order calls on state officials to take down thousands of homeless encampments across the state, which has the nation’s largest homeless population.

The executive order was made possible by a Supreme Court decision last month: The six conservative justices overruled lower court decisions that deemed sweeps of homeless encampments cruel and unusual punishment.

Under Newsom’s order, state agencies will break up encampments on land they control–such as state parks, highway overpasses and wildlife preserves–giving campers multiple days’ notice and connecting them with housing and other services.

Newsom cannot force cities to move on encampments, but the leaders of many localities, including San Francisco, have already outlined plans to clear them.

Advocates for the homeless have condemned camping bans as both inhumane and ineffective. In a press release on the day of the Supreme Court’s decision, the National Housing Conference argued cracking down on camping without investing in more housing would be counterproductive. “There are few more effective ways to condemn them to chronic homelessness than prosecuting rather than housing them,” the statement reads. “Ironically, the cost of incarceration is significantly greater than the cost of affordable housing.”

The Supreme Court decision stems from a lawsuit filed in Oregon, in which two homeless people claimed that a city’s ban on camping in public spaces violated the Eighth Amendment’s protection against “cruel and unusual punishment.” Before the case reached the Supreme Court, a federal court on the West Coast sided with them, arguing the city could not punish people without access to shelter for sleeping in public places. In June, the Supreme Court reversed the decision, with all six Republican-appointed justices in the majority and the three liberals dissenting. In his opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch said that the Eighth Amendment does not allow federal judges to “dictate this Nation’s homelessness policy.”