THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 5, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
Forbes
Forbes
26 Sep 2023


US-IRAN-DIPLOMACY-PRISONERS

Freed US Morad Tahbaz (C-L) and Emad Shargi (C) smile as US officials arrange a group photo after ... [+] they and three others who were released in a prisoner swap deal between US and Iran, disembark from an airplane at Davison Army Airfield at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, on September 19, 2023. The United States and Iran on September 18, 2023, swapped five prisoners each in one of the arch-foes' first deals in years as Tehran gained access to $6 billion in frozen funds. The five Americans freed by Iran, including one held for eight years, flew out of Tehran in a Qatari jet, hours after the unblocked funds were deposited in accounts also managed by Qatar. (Photo by JONATHAN ERNST / POOL / AFP) (Photo by JONATHAN ERNST/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

POOL/AFP via Getty Images

Washington DC and Tehran have reached an important deal including a prisoner swap and the unfreezing of $6bn of assets. The assets would be transferred to Qatar’s central bank, where they could be used to purchase “humanitarian goods” approved by the US. Five prisoners are to be freed from each side, a point that many commentators have missed.

Unlike with other countries under broad economic restrictions, such as Venezuela, Iran has a longer history of enduring sanctions and asset seizures. While they still harm the economy, the Islamic Republic has learned how to operate around them.

The broader implication of the deal is that it signals a willingness of the White House to negotiate with Tehran. Until recently, President Joe Biden had maintained much of the legacy of the Trump administration. Some insiders claim that the Biden administration could try to get oil flowing from sanctioned Iran and Venezuela, to counter Saudi Arabia and Russia’s production cuts.

There are increasingly more vocal figures in the US establishment questioning policy towards Tehran. A popular argument is that they are not just inefficient, but counter-productive for Washington DC. For instance, Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) argued on X that “maximum pressure” on Iran led to a “more advanced nuclear programme, Iran shooting at US troops, and more support for Iranian proxy armies”.

In an ironic turn, long-standing US ally Saudi Arabia seems to be colliding with Russia to further its interests in the oil market. On the other side, the US could be making extremely complicated overtures to two rivals: Iran and Venezuela.