The Supreme Court found that the panel made "at least two critical legal errors that prevent us from resolving the matter on this record." For that reason, it decided to send the case back to the panel "to make new findings in the light of the law as it actually exists, and to do so quickly."
The Supreme Court said the panel made "two critical legal errors."
FAMILY OF GEORGIA MAN WHO KILLED HIMSELF IN POLICE INTERVIEW ROOM SUES CITY OF SAVANNAH
A high court in Georgia is undecided on the fate of an appeals judge who was accused of ethical misconduct.
First, it was wrong in its determination that the Judicial Qualifications Commission could pursue discipline for conduct occurring before a person becomes a judge or a judicial candidate, the opinion says.
Second, the high court justices wrote, the panel "failed to understand the circumstances in which the Constitution and our case law permits judicial discipline." The opinion says that actions taken outside of a judicial capacity "warrant discipline only when taken in bad faith." None of the counts against Coomer have to do with actions taken in a judicial capacity, and the panel's report "was ambiguous as to whether it found the Judge Coomer acted with bad faith," the opinion says.
"Intent was a matter of enormous dispute in this matter, and this Court is not well positioned to resolve the factual questions of intent that are crucial to determining whether discipline is constitutionally permitted," the opinion says.
For that reason, the high court wrote, it is sending the case back to the panel to resolve several questions. The justices instructed the panel to file a new report with the Supreme Court within 60 days.