The commission said that Naman repeatedly appointed his brother-in-law over an 11-year-period to represent indigent defendants. The cannons of judicial ethics says that judges should make appointments on merit and not nepotism or favoritism.
MEXICAN PRESIDENT ACCUSES CHIEF JUSTICE OF BEING SOFT ON CRIME
An Alabama ethics panel has censored Judge Edmond Naman who violated ethical standards when he repeatedly hired his brother-in-law over 11 years to handle cases.
Naman agreed that his actions violated a cannon of judicial ethics and said he would no longer appoint his brother-in-law. The parties also agreed that Naman could also show evidence that his motivation in the appointment was to ensure quality representation for the defendants.
The Court of the Judiciary approved the settlement Thursday following a public hearing. The agreement swiftly resolved the complaint that was filed Monday and allowed Naman to return to the bench. He had been automatically suspended after the complaint was filed.