The mission of the Mint changed as it became an adjunct to the Federal Reserve, to which Congress delegated expansion or contraction of the money supply under the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. As a result, the mint retained responsibilities and powers delegated by Congress in Title 31 of the United States Code.. 31 U.S.C. §5111(a)(1), which instructs the secretary of the Treasury to produce the coins described in Section 5112 " in amounts the Secretary decides are necessary to meet the needs of the United States." Those coins, from pennies to half-dollars, are specified – along with their compositions – in 31 U.S.C. §5112. 

DEMOCRATS' SPENDING THREATENS AMERICANS' HIGH STANDARD OF LIVING

Since the creation of the Mint, the treasurer has ensured that there are enough coins in circulation to ensure that those engaged in everyday commerce can conduct transactions without having to resort to giving change in candy, as is done in some countries with coin shortages. The Mint sends its newly minted coins to the Federal Reserve, which then distributes them to its member banks as needed. 

The Mint produces about 14 billion coins – worth some $1.1 billion – each year. That’s roughly the same level of production as in 1976, despite massive population and economic growth. With more transactions being done via check or credit card, there has been no need for a large increase in coinage. 

Congress further expressly authorized the Mint to strike commemorative coins and collectibles that may be sold to the public at a markup. It may also produce pure gold and silver coins – typically not used for everyday commercial transactions – sufficient "to meet public demand" and made available to the public at a cost not exceeding the production plus marketing expenses (Section 5112(i) and (f). 

There is no reason to believe that Congress, when it enacted this statutory provision largely for the creation of souvenir coins, also intended to give the Mint effective control of the money supply, which is exactly what would happen if the Mint could issue coins in nonsense values like $1 trillion. 

Furthermore, exercise of such power – even if lawful – would stoke economic mayhem by inducing unlimited increases in the amount of dollars in existence. 

Today, Treasury has only very limited capacity to issue U.S. currency notes – only up to $300 million may be outstanding and in circulation. (31 U.S. Code Section 5115) and none may be held or used for reserve. These are not to be confused with Federal Reserve Notes we think of as cash. Although the U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing produces these notes, this is done at the behest of the Federal Reserve under the authority given the central bank by Congress under the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 that actually delegated responsibility over money creation to the Fed. 

Minting $1 trillion coins dutifully bought by the Fed would effectively end the supposed independence of the Federal Reserve. Treasury has already dramatically eroded the separation between the politically motivated administration and the supposed neutral experts at the Federal Reserve by effectively forcing the Fed to buy trillions in new debt during COVID lockdowns. 

But never has the U.S. Mint used its limited minting authority as a mechanism to create coins with fake denominations for the purpose of funding government operations. 

Such a concept lies in the realm of banana republics. Indeed, a trillion-dollar coin would further concentrate American monetary policy into the hands of one of the most reckless administrations in our nation’s history, while paving the way for much higher inflation in the future. 

Peter St. Onge is the think tank’s Mark A. Kolokotrones Fellow in Economic Freedom.