Democrat House Member Jasmin Crockett (TX, 30th District): “I challenge you to find a clip of a Democrat invoking violence.”
“It’s not our fault” say the Democrats who are constantly using violent rhetoric and saying the most-vile things imaginable about [Republicans]”.
See the easy response to Crockett’s foolish challenge here: Carl Sian, Twitter,
In 2016, [the Minnesota assassin Vance Boetler] was appointed to the Governor’s Workforce Development Board … by then-Governor of Minnesota [Democrat] Mark Dayton and[Democrat] Governor Tim Walz reappointed him to a four-year term in 2019.
New York Post, 6/14/25
Minnesota State Patrol shared a photo which said [anti-Trump] “No kings” fliers found inside the vehicle of the [Minnesota shooting] suspect [Vance Boetler]
NBC, 6/15/25
Dozens of Democrats decided not to join Republicans in approving a resolution honouring conservative activist Charlie Kirk, who was assassinated in Utah last week. … 38 Democrats voted “present,” 58 voted against the resolution, and 22 did not vote at all.
Newsweek, 9/19/25
[Charlie Kirk] … didn’t even believe I could be smart enough, I could have thoughts … equal to a white man.
House Rep. Ilhan Omar (MI), 9/21/25
Did the late Charlie Kirk say “Black women do not have the brain processing power to be taken seriously” as social media posts claim? No, that’s not a precise quote [emphasis added]: Attacking affirmative action, Kirk slammed by name four prominent liberal Black women. …, Rep. Shirley Jackson Lee, D-Texas, TV host Joy Reid, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and attorney and former First Lady Michelle Obama.
Fack Check, 9/16/25
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.), … denounced [Charlie Kirk] as “ignorant” and asserted that he “sought to disenfranchise millions of Americans.” The GOP resolution, she said, “brings great pain to the millions of Americans who endured segregation, Jim Crow, and the legacy of that bigotry today.”
It does no such thing. … These bitter partisans saw greater political value in spitting on a man’s grave than in respectfully keeping faith with their parents’ good advice.
Wall Street Journal, 9/22/25
It is hard to battle with one’s own anger, for whatever it wants it buys at the price of the soul.
5th-6th Century B.C. Ancient Greek Philosopher Heraclitus
One of the main fairytales cobbled together by the Democrats and their essential Democrat Party Propaganda Collective or DPPC (aka the “mainstream” or “legacy” media) in order to avoid responsibility for their role in the ghoulish assassination of Charlie Kirk, as well as much other leftist violence mostly ignored by the Left, is that both sides commit that kind of political violence. However, despite the existence of nutcases on both sides, that is transparently false. At the present time it is the Left that is calling for violence against their political opponents. Fortunately, despite the shameless efforts of the DPPC to cover for the Democrats, this is increasingly becoming clear to more and more Americans … hence the panic on the Left. These points have been made by many commentators, but never more masterfully than by Batya Ungar-Sargon (in no mood to put up with the standard leftist lies). It is worth quoting from her powerful remarks on this issue at length but every reader should watch her powerful presentations in the videos themselves,
I’m seething about [President Obama’s] remarks. He acts like “I’m going to do the unity-thing … We can both condemn what happened to Charlie in no uncertain terms and say we disagree with him. Then what are the examples [Obama] gives of disagreeing with Charlie? They are all about race and all mischaracterizations of what Charlie said, including the fabricated quote [see here] that Karen Attiah was fired [from the Washington Post] for fabricating, all painting Charlie as a racist. … President Obama did his classic move, insisting he’s better than Republicans because he isn’t divisive and doesn’t demonize the other side …. and then proceeded [in that very talk] to demonize them [emphasis added], including invoking “made up” quotes to paint Charlie as racist. … Not only did [Obama during his 2 terms] demonize everybody on the Right as clinging to their guns and Bibles implying [they’re all] racists, Neanderthals etc., he did it on that very stage [talking about Charlie Kirk]! He literally could not get through the event without demonizing the other side, while pretending his hands are so clean from this!
Batya Ungar-Sargon, 9/18/25
I’m finding myself very caught between … wanting to honour Charlie Kirk’s legacy of unity through debate and coming together to take down the temperature, and then wanting to honour his legacy of telling the truth. [But] the truth is this is not a both sides issue. [Tyler Robinson] killed [Charlie], according to police reports, because he found Charlie to be spreading hate … a view shared by every single prominent Democrat [emphasis added].
[W]hat actually caused [Kirk’s assassination] was the utterly [constant] demonization of [Republicans] from the left, and it has led to violence because they said [Republicans] were Hitler and Nazis [and] that speech is violence. To combine those two things together sign’s the death warrant of prominent conservatives. And that’s what we’re seeing again and again [emphasis added].
[I]t is utterly facetious to suggest that there is any comparison between political violence on both sides. [And] every example [Democrats provide does] not actually show that, whether it’s Governor Shapiro whose attempted assassination was from a “free Palestine!” leftist, or the Minnesota assassinations, which were from somebody who said he was operating at the behest of Democrat Governor Tim Walz. … [The assassination of Charlie Kirk is] not like [the case of] David DePape who hit Paul Pelosi with a hammer [and] is an insane person. … [The real problem is that] there is a culture among Democrats at the highest level to [claim Republican] are a danger, and suggests their lives are forfeit. … [W]e cannot unite with people who are lying to our faces about who we are, who will not take responsibility [because] they [claim] we are Nazis because of totally legitimate [conservative] views that reflect the majority of Americans [emphasis added]. …
Batya Ungar-Sargon, with Emily Jashinsky, 9/19/25
Even in their denunciations [of the Kirk assassination], the Left is gaslighting us about the truth: The vast majority of the political violence in this country is coming from their side. And they are unwilling to take an ounce of responsibility for it. … They can’t — because there’s nothing in their philosophy to explain why the cold-blooded murder of Charlie Kirk is wrong. They view the world not through the Judeo-Christian lens of right versus wrong, but through the lens of power. In their view, people with less power have no moral responsibilities. … [B]ut it gets better: some say that [criticizing the] Democrats’ charged rhetoric … is creating a more charged atmosphere. These people are idiots, and that’s why these would-be assassins can hide so well. [The violent Left are] getting quite a bit of cover from the legacy media [all emphasis added].
Batya Ungar-Sargon, 9/12/25
So [if the Left is serious about bringing down the temperature, then let them admit they] were wrong [and that] it’s legitimate to vote for Trump. It is legitimate to be pro-life. It is legitimate to believe that there are only 2 genders, and [that] we [the Left] were wrong to suggest that that was not the case. We [the Left] were wrong to say that [all that] is hateful. When [the Left makes those mundane admissions], I am waiting with open arms to take down the temperature.
Batya Ungar-Sargon, 9/14/25
Unfortunately, instead of doing the eminently reasonably things Ungar-Sargon suggests, Democrats and the DPPC, not, apparently, blessed with a capacity for self-reflection, are doubling down on their dishonest divisive hateful messages. Numerous bogus examples are trotted out to convict conservatives of similar violence. This is the attempt to deflect via “Both-sides-ism”, e.g., the claim that “both sides do it.” Then they use the absurd example of the firebombing of Democrat Governor Shapiro’s house when that was the action of a leftist pro-Palestinian activist. Duh! They use the assassination of the two Minnesota Democrat lawmakers by Vance Boettler. Although Boettler may, admittedly, have had some right-wing associations and views, he also had left-wing associations, appointed by two Democrat governors to advisory positions and found at the crime scene with anti-Trump “No Kings” flyers in his car. He appears to be a nutcase, not a respected Republican or conservative. But the key point in the Boettler case is that when the two Minnesota Democrats were assassinated, all prominent Republicans unequivocally condemned the murders. And one did not find one single prominent Republican cheering or dancing with joy in the streets. Duh! By contrast, a plethora of ghoulish leftists could be seen dancing with joy in the streets over Kirk’s assassination and many prominent Democrats refused to support the congressional resolution to honour Kirk.
Democrats and their DPPC shills have also, absurdly, tried to compare the attack on Paul Pelosi with a hammer with the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The two cases are not even remotely comparable. On the outside chance that the Left can still distinguish between life and death, one must point out that whereas Paul Pelosi was released from the hospital only 6 days after the attack, Charlie Kirk is dead forever to his wife and two children. Duh! Even more important, Ungar Sargon brilliantly analyses the key difference between the two,
[The Kirk assassin is] not like David DePape who hit Paul Pelosi with a hammer [and] who is an insane person. [By contrast] this guy [Robinson] who killed Charlie sounds exactly like every Democrat [emphasis added].
Whereas DePape is a nutcase that nobody in the Republican Party defends or identifies with, Robinson with his extremist trans ideology and labelling of Kirk as a “fascist” is reflecting the constantly repeated words and themes of the entire Democrat Party. That is, following the Democrat’s constant standard strategy of character assassination against their political opponents, calling them fascists, Hitler, etc., as opposed to proposing solutions to real problems of Americans, Robinson murdered a husband and father of two children who offered to talk with his political opponents on any subject. Duh!
As Ilhan Omar’s accusations demonstrate, the left cannot even correctly describe what Charlie said. Whether it is Donald Trump or Charlier Kirk, etc., they always, change the words, in this case, changing remark about a few particular people into a general condemnation of a race. Despite her belief in her own brilliance, Omar would not appear to have sufficient brain power to distinguish between the particular and the general. Duh!
The Democrats who refused to salute the life of Charlie Kirk even pretend, soullessly, that by saluting an assassinated father and husband, they are also saluting his political views. But the Republicans who saluted the two murdered Minnesota Democrats did not pretend that by saluting them one is also celebrating their political views, for example their views on abortion. Duh!
AOC, like most democrats, must always, speaking in gross generalities, respond hysterically, labelling mere disagreements about how to move forwards in the country as hate. The Left’s recipe (word game) for labelling the centrist views of their opponents as hateful is quite simple. They simply define disagreeing with Democrats as hate. Presto! No thinking needed (perfect for the Left). If one disagrees with the Democrats, one is hateful.
Ungar-Sargon is even more critical of The Messiah (Obama), who, in his affirmative action greatness (he refuses to release his transcripts from Occidental College), represents Himself as the great statesman, above division, and then, as if the peasants cannot see or reason at His transcendent level, proceeds to demonize the other side, even, soullessly, using a demonstrably “made up” quote to demonize Charlie, still lying unburied in his casket in front of his wife, as a racist.
It was not just Tyler Robinson, repeating the standard Democrat Party smears, who assassinated Charlier Kirk. The soulless left is still assassinating Charlie, assassinating his character, with demonstrably fabricated smears and hoaxes. The 2024 election did not, unfortunately, convince the Democrats and their DPPC shills that the peasants are now wise to their constant cynical treachery.
Agree/Disagree with the author(s)? Let them know in the comments below and be heard by 10’s of thousands of CDN readers each day!