Constitutional Scholar Mark Levin warned Sunday that Vice President Kamala Harris’ plan to create “equity” in America is “a prescription for tyranny and totalitarianism.” But, even if tyranny could achieve this impossible goal, it would require even greater, and constant, brutality to maintain it and still have a functioning society.

On the latest episode of “Life, Liberty & Levin,” Levin played several video clips of Democrat presidential candidate Harris declaring that her vision of “equity” is that “everyone should end up in the same place.”

Harris’ concept of so-called equity is both dehumanizing and horrific, Levin explained:

“You cannot have freedom if you do not respect the sovereignty of the individual. Each of us as individual human beings. Otherwise you have these horrendous totalitarian regimes. The centralized powers with iron fists.”

“When you keep talking about ‘Equity is the endgame, equity is the endgame,’ that is about dehumanizing the individual. This is what totalitarian regimes do,” Levin said, explaining how Harris’ ideology is “pure Marxism”:

“We have seen this play out throughout the world. Ladies and gentlemen, you heard her - that is a prescription for tyranny and totalitarianism, which leads to horrendous things.”

….

“So we end up in the same place? Doesn’t this sound like we’re going to end up in a gulag?”

“We have seen this play out throughout the world. Ladies and gentlemen, you heard her - that is a prescription for tyranny and totalitarianism, which leads to horrendous things,” Levin warned.

Levin is right when he warns that tyranny and totalitarianism beget incredible horrors. Nazis believed in “wealth distribution.”

But, even if (somehow) everyone could be forced to “end up in the same place,” the tyranny of a totalitarian government wouldn’t stop there.

Without even greater government tyranny, an everybody-in-the-same-place society would be untenable, for two main reasons:

1. If everyone was put in the same place, they wouldn’t stay there.
2. If everyone was forced to stay in the same place, nothing would get done,

After arriving at the same starting place, people with more talent and drive would gain more than those with less talent and drive, putting them on unequal footing once again. Thus, it would take the intervention of a totalitarian government to keep rebalancing the equation by taking from the more successful and giving to the less so.

Once people realize that all effort is pointless, because they’ll all end up in the same place regardless of whether they do something or do nothing, it’ll take the brutality of a tyrannical government to compel the productivity that provides citizens their food, energy, utilities, etc.

So, as Levin says, individual freedom and individualism are the trademarks of a vibrant society – and it’s not the government’s job to force us all into the same place.