Robert Roberson has gained bipartisan from lawmakers and medical experts who say he was convicted on faulty evidence of the shaken baby diagnosis.


<div class="paywall-container">
<div class="textbox">
<h4 style="padding: 0 0 20px"> <a href="https://checkout.bostonherald.com/?&amp;g2i_or_o=Internet&amp;g2i_or_p=mg2pw20&amp;g2i_source=MD&amp;g2i_medium=sspw&amp;g2i_campaign=MG2PW20-sspw&amp;returnUrl=https3A2F2Fwww.bostonherald.com2F">Subscribe</a> to continue reading this article.</h4>
<h4> Already subscribed? <a href="https://www.bostonherald.com/login?&amp;returnUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonherald.com%2F2024%2F11%2F15%2Ftexas-supreme-court-execution-roberson%2F">To login in, click here.</a></h4>
</div>
</div>


Originally Published: <time datetime="2024-11-15 12:49:57">November 15, 2024 at 12:49 PM EST</time>

Robert Roberson has gained bipartisan from lawmakers and medical experts who say he was convicted on faulty evidence of the shaken baby diagnosis.{ai:summary}<p>Robert Roberson is receiving bipartisan support from lawmakers and medical experts who argue that his conviction was based on flawed evidence regarding a shaken baby diagnosis. This case has raised concerns about the reliability of such medical determinations in legal contexts. #crime</p>

Texas Supreme Court rules against lawmakers who stopped execution with last-minute subpoena

Subscribe to continue reading this article.

Already subscribed? To login in, click here.

Loading...