Democratic leaders can't make the case that laws should only be enforced if they like them. This stance will cost constituents in terms of both funding — and safety.


<div class="paywall-container">
<div class="textbox">
<h4 style="padding: 0 0 20px"> <a href="https://checkout.bostonherald.com/?&amp;g2i_or_o=Internet&amp;g2i_or_p=mg2pw20&amp;g2i_source=MD&amp;g2i_medium=sspw&amp;g2i_campaign=MG2PW20-sspw&amp;returnUrl=https3A2F2Fwww.bostonherald.com2F">Subscribe</a> to continue reading this article.</h4>
<h4> Already subscribed? <a href="https://www.bostonherald.com/login?&amp;returnUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonherald.com%2F2024%2F11%2F27%2Feditorial-massachusetts-citizens-face-fallout-from-anti-trump-resistance%2F">To login in, click here.</a></h4>
</div>
</div>


Originally Published: <time datetime="2024-11-27 00:45:10">November 27, 2024 at 12:45 AM EST</time>

Democratic leaders can’t make the case that laws should only be enforced if they like them. This stance will cost constituents in terms of both funding — and safety.{ai:summary}<p>Democratic leaders risk undermining public safety and funding by suggesting that laws should only be enforced selectively. This approach could have significant consequences for constituents. </p><p>#politics</p>

Editorial: Massachusetts citizens face fallout from anti-Trump ‘resistance’

Subscribe to continue reading this article.

Already subscribed? To login in, click here.

Loading...