Every day, constituents ask me, “Why is she still there?” They’re referring to Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson, who recently pleaded guilty to federal corruption charges. Legally, she remains in office until sentencing. But morally? That’s a different story.

I understand the legal constraints. The Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in Turner v. City of Boston clarified that the Council lacks the authority to remove a member before sentencing. Rule 40A mandates the Council President to refer such matters to the Council upon a felony conviction, but it doesn’t grant removal powers.

In response to my resolution, the Council President has cited Rule 40A and the Turner decision, asserting that the Council lacks the authority to remove a member before sentencing (July 29). While this is legally accurate, it misses the essence of my proposal. My resolution doesn’t seek to enforce a legal removal but to express our collective moral stance. By leaning on legal technicalities, the Council risks appearing evasive, avoiding a clear position on an issue that deeply concerns our constituents.

However, this isn’t about legal authority; it’s about moral responsibility. We, as elected officials, have an obligation to uphold the integrity of our office and the trust of our constituents. Remaining silent sends the wrong message.

The resolution I filed with Councilor Ed Flynn isn’t about forcing anyone out; it’s about taking a stand. We pass non-binding resolutions on various issues — international conflicts, national policies, historical acknowledgments. For example, the Council has previously passed resolutions supporting international human rights efforts, even though we lack the authority to enforce such matters. These actions, while symbolic, reflect our collective values and commitment to justice.

So why hesitate now, when the issue is within our own chambers? Councilor Fernandes Anderson’s continued presence undermines public trust and distracts from our work. Her district deserves effective representation, and the city deserves a Council that leads with integrity.

Some argue that taking a vote is divisive or premature. But leadership isn’t about waiting for the courts; it’s about responding to the community’s concerns. By voting on this resolution, we demonstrate our commitment to ethical governance and accountability.

I urge my colleagues to join me in this stand. Let’s show the people of Boston that we hear them, we respect them, and we’re committed to doing what’s right — not just what’s legally required.