The Journal claims to have seen pages from a birthday album compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003three years before Epstein was first arrested and long before any criminal allegations became public. The album allegedly contains letters from various wealthy individuals who moved in Epstein's social circles.
According to the Journal, one page contains Trump's signature on what they describe as a "bawdy" note with crude drawings. Trump categorically denies writing it.
...
Here's what the Journal doesn't tell you: They provide no evidence that this letter was authenticated. No handwriting analysis. No chain of custody documentation. No forensic verification. Just their word that they "reviewed" it among Justice Department documents.
The paper admits they don't know "how the letter with Trump's signature was prepared," yet they're comfortable plastering it across their front page anyway. If you can't verify authenticity, why publish it at all?
It didn't stop them from running with Hillary Clinton's fabricated "dossier" now did it?
Yashar Ali
@yashar
BREAKING
The Wall Street Journal has reviewed a book put together for Jeffrey Epstein�s 50th birthday, as part of that book a letter was submitted by Donald Trump.
Trump's letter features a drawing of a naked woman and this text which imagines a conversation between Trump and Epstein.
Uh-huh.
The letter bearing Trump's name, which was reviewed by the Journal, is bawdy--like others in the album. It contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker. A pair of small arcs denotes the woman's breasts, and the future president's signature is a squiggly "Donald" below her waist, mimicking pubic hair.
The letter concludes: "Happy Birthday -- and may every day be another wonderful secret."
In an interview with the Journal on Tuesday evening, Trump denied writing the letter or drawing the picture. "This is not me. This is a fake thing. It's a fake Wall Street Journal story," he said.
"I never wrote a picture in my life. I don't draw pictures of women," he said. "It's not my language. It's not my words."
He told the Journal he was preparing to file a lawsuit if it published an article. "I'm gonna sue The Wall Street Journal just like I sued everyone else," he said.
So if Jeffrey Epstein has a piece of art allegedly from a bigwig, that bigwig necessarily participated in it?
So Bill Clinton posed in drag for this painting on Epstein's Pedo Island, huh?
Trump posted this on Truth Social:
The Wall Street Journal, and Rupert Murdoch, personally, were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a FAKE and, if they print it, they will be sued. Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so. The Editor of The Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Karoline Leavitt, and by President Trump, that the letter was a FAKE, but Emma Tucker didn't want to hear that. Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway.
President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr. Murdoch, shortly. The Press has to learn to be truthful, and not rely on sources that probably don't even exist. President Trump has already beaten George Stephanopoulos/ABC, 60 Minutes/CBS, and others, and looks forward to suing and holding accountable the once great Wall Street Journal. It has truly turned out to be a 'Disgusting and Filthy Rag' and, writing defamatory lies like this, shows their desperation to remain relevant.
If there were any truth at all on the Epstein Hoax, as it pertains to President Trump, this information would have been revealed by Comey, Brennan, Crooked Hillary, and other Radical Left Lunatics years ago. It certainly would not have sat in a file waiting for 'TRUMP' to have won three Elections. This is yet another example of FAKE NEWS!
People point out that this seems to be before Jeffrey Epstein was arrested, but that is hardly conclusive. No one can deny they knew of Epstein's reputation after his arrest. (So why did Matt Lauer and Katie Couric visit him post-arrest?)
But people also knew he was into shady stuff before the arrest. Trump can deny that he knew about Epstein, but it's not like no one knew until the arrest.
It is now impossible for Trump to contain this just by Jedi Mind Tricking MAGA that "these aren't the files you're looking for."
The media sharks have brushed against Trump and drawn a trickle of blood; they are about to go into a frenzy. It is impossible to stop them, so they only good response is just to release it all and let God separate the wicked from the innocent.
I am now a bit more suspicious that James Comey's wretched daughter, who prosecuted Epstein and then Ghislaine Maxwell, might have leaked this to a friendly media source to get a special counsel appointed. Like father, like daughter.
A contrary view: