A Father's Love -- the Continuing Voyages.
Biden's daughter can tell a few tales about A Father's Love, but the media's not interested in that.
The marching orders to the media have gone out, and the orders are to claim (as the media already has been claiming) that there is "no evidence" -- zero, nada, nil, nothing, zip -- that Joe Biden had anything at all to do with Hunter's collection of bribes from Russian gangsters, corrupt Ukrainian oligarchs, and Chinese intelligence operatives posing (weakly) as oil men.
Raskin said, "It's ridiculous, of course. I mean you've got people who voted not to impeach Donald Trump for inciting a violent insurrection against a union either because they don't think that's a crime or they don't think the evidence was there even though the evidence was overwhelming."
...
Raskin added, "There's no evidence of treason, bribery or high crimes and misdemeanors. There's no evidence of any crime at all by Joe Biden. So all of this is clearly being driven by Donald Trump who wants to establish this counterfeit moral equivalency between the two of them just so he can say he's running against another impeached president. So it's really silly."
The Biden White House has explicitly sent the media its marching orders, instructing them to not cover the impeachment inquiry neutrally -- just reporting what each side claims -- but to make it clear in their "news coverage" that Republicans are very mean liars who lie.
The White House is sending the letter to news outlets like CNN, The New York Times, and Fox News. It urges them to "ramp up their scrutiny" of House Republicans "for opening an impeachment inquiry based on lies." That's the popular talking point -- the alleged impeachable conduct by Biden are all just lies. There is no evidence. That's their story and they are sticking to it.
...
The White House leaked a draft letter to news executives to CNN on Tuesday. White House Counsel's Office spokesman Ian Sams insists there is no supporting evidence for impeachment. He said it "should set off alarm bells for news organizations."
CNN's former Junior Deplatforming Officer, now their Senior Deplatforming Officer, and their "media reporter" Oliver Darcy dutifully relays the marching orders to the rest of the media:
In its letter Wednesday, the White House will ask news organizations to be more clear-eyed in their coverage of the impeachment inquiry, and not to fall prey to the traps of false equivalency in reporting.
"Covering impeachment as a process story -- Republicans say X, but the White House says Y -- is a disservice to the American public who relies on the independent press to hold those in power accountable," Sams wrote.
"And in the modern media environment, where every day liars and hucksters peddle disinformation and lies everywhere from Facebook to Fox, process stories that fail to unpack the illegitimacy of the claims on which House Republicans are basing all their actions only serve to generate confusion, put false premises in people's feeds, and obscure the truth," Sams added.
So, 1: It's disinformation. Like everything else we don't like is.
2: You have a duty to call Republicans liars and to support Democrat claims. For Justice.
Some journalists are actually pushing back against this, objecting to the White House's open, public attempt to use social pressure and the not-so-subtle threat of cancellation and social destruction to bully all of its leftwing media allies to be its robotic mouthpieces. Click the link for that.
Do not doubt that that's why this is being done publicly instead of privately, as it's usually done: the Biden White House and its more sinister media operatives want all "journalists" to know that if they step out of line on this, they will be #Cancelled, not just by Biden's White House, but by all their media peers.
As for why Biden attended business meetings in which Hunter Biden was hoovering up money like it was top-drawer crack cocaine based on the promise that if they paid Hunter money, Joe Biden would "deliver for you" -- it was all because of A Father's Love.
Meanwhile, the depositions from Hunter Biden's noxious intimidation-by-lawsuit action against the laptop repairman have been released.
So his privacy was invaded by someone making public a laptop belonging to someone else?
This is the lie he has to cling to. He has to claim, simultaneously, that the laptop was not his but also that the laptop definitely was his and it's an offense to release it to the public.
Hunter Biden testified recently that he was embarrassed by "offensive" content published from his laptop after he dropped it off for repair at The Mac Shop in Wilmington, Delaware, on April 12, 2019 -- but still denies that the laptop or its contents are his.
The first son provided confusing and often contradictory testimony under oath on June 29 during a six-hour deposition related to a defamation action brought by John Paul Mac Isaac, the owner of the now-defunct computer repair shop, who accuses Hunter of falsely insisting the laptop was not his, or was stolen, or that his information was hacked.
Hunter is countersuing Mac Isaac, accusing him of illegally distributing his personal data and invading his privacy.
But the laptop isn't his!
He should be sanctioned by the judge and referred for a perjury investigation.
...
Hunter refused to admit in his deposition that he visited The Mac Shop twice in April 2019, despite Mac Isaac presenting evidence that Hunter signed a work order and provided his contact information.
Bank records that Hunter was required to hand over to Mac Isaac's legal team also show "frequent uses of Wells Fargo ATMs where significant withdrawals were made -- all within a few miles of Mac Isaac's shop," the filing says.
...
Hunter's "confused and dishonest responses prove fatal to all facts alleged in his counterclaims."
Hunter claimed he was "embarrassed" by publication of private material that would be "highly offensive to a reasonable person," according to the filing, yet much of the material that a reasonable person would find most offensive, such as sexually explicit photos, was "voluntarily shared by [Hunter] Biden with others through the website, 'Pornhub.' ...
"The use of the 'reasonable person' standard should clearly not apply to Biden ... It seems what would embarrass a reasonable person does not embarrass Biden."
Hunter Biden laptop photos Biden refused to admit that the laptop was his. "He either doesn't recall or denies it altogether."
...
In his deposition, Hunter also:
* Gave "confused and dishonest responses" about whether he dropped off the laptop with Mac Isaac on April 12, 2019, or returned a day or two later at Mac Isaac's request with an external hard drive onto which his data could be transferred.
- Refused to admit that the laptop was his. "He either doesn't recall or denies it altogether."
* "Hems and haws about how embarrassing the content of the laptop was while, at the same time, failing to identify what content and if it was even his content."