Just like Fauci employing multiple cut-out subgrantees to fund the creation of covid-19 in China.
In other words: They'd never be able to prove the case, and don't even get me started on Blue City Juries.
President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that progressive megadonor George Soros and his son "should be charged with RICO" for supporting "violent protests" across the U.S.
"George Soros, and his wonderful Radical Left son, should be charged with RICO because of their support of Violent Protests, and much more, all throughout the United States of America," Trump posted on Truth Social.
"We're not going to allow these lunatics to rip apart America any more, never giving it so much as a chance to 'BREATHE,' and be FREE," he added. "Soros, and his group of psychopaths, have caused great damage to our Country! That includes his Crazy, West Coast friends. Be careful, we're watching you! Thank you for your attention to this matter!"
Soros has donated, often through nonprofits, to various progressive causes. He has also supported the campaigns of progressive district attorneys across the country.
A spokesperson from Soros' Open Society Foundations told Just the News in a statement on Wednesday: "These accusations are outrageous and false. The Open Society Foundations do not support or fund violent protests. Our mission is to advance human rights, justice, and democratic principles at home and around the world. We stand for fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, including the rights to free speech and peaceful protest that are hallmarks of any vibrant democracy."
Soros funded the pro-Hamas organization with the outrageously fake name "Jewish Voices for Peace" that stormed the Capitol just weeks after the 10/7 slaughter of Israelis.
Strangely, DC prosecutors did not charge these paraders and official-business-disruptors with any crimes.
Through Soros's philanthropic work, JVP was awarded several grants totaling $650,000 that bankrolled its "human rights" campaign and "social welfare activities" in the Middle East, according to a grant database maintained by the Soros-funded Open Society Foundations, the central hub of the financier's anti-capitalist, redistributionist network. The Soros-branded Open Society Policy Center Inc. -- once the second-largest spender on federal lobbying after the U.S. Chamber of Commerce -- donated $150,000 and $200,000 in 2021 and 2019, respectively, to the Jewish Voice for Peace Action Incorporated, JVP's tax-exempt 501(c)(3). And, in 2017, Soros's primary grant-giving vehicle, the Foundation to Promote Open Society, gifted JVP $300,000.
As Spencer points out, like its Orwellian title, JVP does not act in good faith. The Jewish-in-name-only JVP is not Jewish, nor is it peace-seeking; JVP is as opportunistically "Jew-ish" as George Santos and as peaceful as the fiery Black Lives Matter protests.
"Deploying its 'Jewish' identity in attacking Israel is JVP's métier, one might say its purpose. The cutting edge of this work [...] is to deflect accusations of anti-Semitism..." Commentary contributor Joshua Muravchik explains in a deep-dive on JVP's duplicitous nature. "Were it not for the strategic advantage of speaking 'as Jews,' it is likely that some of the self-described 'progressive and leftist' activists who constitute JVP's membership would have little interest in belonging to a Jewish organization." Indeed, some JVP's members are not Jews. Rather, it's a collection of radical-left ideologues "who realize that their lineage affords special leverage in attacking Israel," Muravchik puts it. "Nowhere does JVP evince any genuine interest in Judaism or in the well-being of the Jewish people or any reverence for the accouterments of Jewish life -- holidays, prayers, ceremonial garments, Hebrew words -- that it appropriates as props or adornments in its impassioned campaign for Palestinian vanquishment of Israel."
On its old FAQ page, prior to revisions, JVP acknowledged, "No you don't" "have to be Jewish to join." Simply, JVP is "inspired by Jewish values and traditions."
But I imagine he's got a Fauci-like series of dummy groups between him and antifa.
Related: the other day I faulted Trump for signing an EO ordering federal agents and prosecutors to arrest and charge people for burning the flag.
That's not what he did.
The left has created a Fake Law that says that if a leftist commits a crime while also committing an arguable act of free expression, the arguable act of free expression automatically immunizes them from prosecution for their crimes.
Thus every blue city judge sets antifa rioters and terrorists free after three hours in the county clink, sentencing them to "time served." The left feels that if you're pushing a political position -- only a left-wing position, you understand -- you gain immunity for all criminal action taken while pushing that position.
That is not the law and never has been, though it is currently the de facto law.
Don't worry: No one on the right ever has the benefit of this law. Grandmothers are sent to prison for years for merely praying outside of an abortion clinic, and J6 defendants are prosecuted for assault for throwing a bag of potato chips at a cop.
(Note that no judge or jury thought that the J6er was "overcharged" for that.)
Trump's EO instructed federal agents and prosecutors to stop treating this Fake Law as if it's the actual law. If someone commits a crime, like incitement to riot, that crime should be prosecuted, even if the incitement took the form of burning a flag. The speech element of the crime does not immunize the criminal from prosecution from the crime element of the crime.
Similarly, it's generally illegal to burn anything in public -- burning a flag shouldn't be an exception to the law.
Some asshole burned the flag in a federal park and got arrested. Good.
Unrelated but also kind of related: Ole Miss students engage in the Speech Crime of singing the Star Spangled Banner as Muslims attack the country.