David Strom has the details on the state senatorial seat we lost.
Keep that mind as the critical Wisconsin Supreme Court election approaches.
YouGov: President Trump Approval
Among Adults
Approve: 48% (+3)
Disapprove: 46% (-4)
Registered voters
Approve: 48% (+1)
Disapprove: 50% (=)
(shift vs last week)
----
White: 55-41
Black: 19-69
Hispanic: 48-47
---
Ages 18-29: 49-41
Ages 30-44: 42-51
Ages 45-64: 48-46
Ages 65+: 52-47
Dem: 10-86
GOP: 93-5
Indie: 40-49
---
Male: 55-40
Female: 41-52
The Economist | March 22-25 | 1,600 A
Mark Mitchell, Rasmussen Reports
@honestpollster
Sigh.
Right Track back up to 47.
Independent Trump approval almost back to parity.
Trump net +5
Democrat Trump approval at 26%
I'm worried about Democrats.
This is upsetting Democrats: Because people are voting with their feet and moving out of blue state hell-holes for happy and healthy red states, Democrats will face a reapportionment disaster in 2032: They are expected to lose twelve electoral votes (and twelve congressional seats) to red states.
Blue states will lose 10 electoral votes and Congressional seats. Swing-states Pennsylvania and Wisconsin will each lose one, too.
A bunch of red or red-purple states will gain one seat each (Arizona, Idaho, etc.). North Carolina will gain two.
California will lose four whole seats and New York three while both Texas and Florida gain four, each.
The upshot of this is that Republicans will be the easy favorites to win in 2032. In fact, Republicans could lose all three states of the "blue wall" (Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania) and win with the remaining red and swing states.
Jimmy Dore had a good point: This is why the Democrats are so determined to fill the country with illegal aliens. Illegal aliens aren't supposed to vote (but of course they do!). But they definitely are counted as "residents" by the Census and for reapportionment purposes. If blue states can offset their citizen losses by importing illegal aliens, they can avoid this reapportionment calamity.
Bonus: Fani Willis and Darius "Sweetdick" Honeycum admitted, only when unshakable evidence was presented, that they had a sexual relationship.
The evidence included receipts of them taking expensive trips together, paid for by Sweetdick (who was paid by Fani Willis, bilking the taxpayers).
Fani Willis testified under oath that even though Sweetdick paid for these trips, she Secretly Repaid him. She had no bank receipts to prove this. She claimed that her Daddy taught her to hide money in shoeboxes so she just had thousands of dollars in cash on hand that she could repay Sweetdick with.
You'll just have to believe her, bro.
They they claimed, under oath, that they had secretly broken up just before Fani Willis hired her boyfriend on the taxpayer's dime to prosecute Trump endlessly (and with endless billable hours).
Here are these two people who totally were telling the truth and who totally didn't perjure themselves at the airport together.
Note they are no longer doing business together.
So they're just a man and woman with no funny business between them taking more expensive trips together.