Weird, weird.
Over the weekend, UPS delivered the latest sure-fired plan from Acme to get Donald Trump -- the Call Him Weird starter kit. The word was sent out and the leftwing nut jobs jubilated.
Salon declared, " 'Old and quite weird': Democrats finally discover new effective attack -- and Republicans hate it.
"After nearly a decade of being forced to take Trump seriously, Democrats increasingly call BS on the whole charade."
Tim Walz, the white guv of Minnesota, told a crowd, "The fascists depend on fear. The fascists depend on us going back. But we are not afraid of weird people. We're a little bit creeped out, but we are not afraid."
This is pure Saul Alinsky, whose Rules for Radicals included No. 5: "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. There is no defense. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."
Calling someone weird only works if you are not weird. Walz may want to sit this one out.
Tim Walz looks like a front runner for Kamala's running mate. He calls Trump and Vance "weird."
Here's his Lieutenant Governor, so you know what his guage of "weird" is:
Seriously, Walz needs to sit this one out. The Tennessee Star reported, "Minnesota Taxpayer-Funded Pride Event to Be Hosted by Satanist Incest Pornographer."
Shall we sashay through some of the rest of the weirdos in the Democrat Party?
Hit the link for more like that.
MSNBC contributor Molly Jong-Fast claimed Tuesday that Republican Sen. J.D. Vance of Ohio was "kind of racist" because he wanted more women to have children. Vance has come under fire for his 2021 comments on women without children at various events during his successful campaign for a Senate seat. Jong-Fast claimed that Vance, despite having biracial children, was using "an authoritarian playbook" before she labeled Vance, whose wife Usha is the daughter of Indian immigrants, as "cruel" and "racist." (RELATED: 'Just Try Racism': MSNBC Guest Claims GOP Used 'First Instinct' Against Kamala Harris) "This is this natalism that comes from an authoritarian playbook, that there need to be more white children, right?" Jong-Fast said. "That's the idea that there is -- this is about great replacement theory racism. This is what it is. So, don't misunderstand him wanting more children. He wants a certain kind of, you know, racist thing. So, I would say it is true and attacking people for not having children is really cruel, right, because some people can't have children." WATCH: Democrats have celebrated the growth of racial minorities as good for their political prospects, according to multiple media reports. The best-selling 2002 book "The Emerging Democratic Majority," by John Judis and Ruy Teixeira, cited "a new postindustrial metropolitan order in which men and women play equal roles and in which white America is supplanted by multiracial, multiethnic America" as part of its thesis, according to The New York Times. Vance called out Democratic Rep. Tim Ryan of Ohio during an October 2022 debate when Ryan attempted to attack him for allegedly promoting the conspiracy theory. "What happens is my own children, my biracial children, get attacked by scumbags online and in person because you are so desperate for political power that you'll accuse me, the father of three beautiful biracial babies, of engaging in racism, we're sick of it," Vance said to Ryan during the Oct. 17, 2022, debate. "You can believe in a border without being racist. You can believe in the country without being a racist. And this just shows how desperate this guy is for political power." "I know you've been in office for 20 years, Tim, and I know it's a sweet gig," Vance continued. "But you're so desperate not to have a real job that you'll slander me and slander my family, it is disgraceful." All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, a The talentless Nepo Baby Molly Jong-Fast, promoted by, get this, Rick Wilson of the Man-Boy Lincoln Project and Bill Kristiol, is chasing clicks and sees Vance as a good target for her click-slanders.
If anybody on the left says anything true it is purely by accident. J.D. Vance is literally the father of biracial children, yet Molly Jong-Fast gets up on MSNBC, sits next to a reporter from POLITICO, and spews this racist, hateful nonsense because the brainwashed masses who watch that North Korean propaganda eat it up.
At least Baghdad Bob was doing his job, lying as the American tanks were in the background of a shot where he asserted that Americans were getting their asses kicked. What is Jong-Fast's excuse?
Perhaps you think I should tone down my rhetoric.
Nope. The left has run a massive brainwashing campaign to convince people that Trump was Hitler, a threat to American democracy, and that J.D. Vance has had sexual relations with a couch and a secret KKK member.
Advertisement
They can go to hell. They got Trump shot, and I am now convinced that at the highest level of government, they arranged things to make an assassin's life easy. All these people are the lowest of the low, which is why our illustrious Vice President appears to endorse Maduro's election as fair.
As long as a socialist wins, it must be fair.
...
These people are sociopaths--and yes, I mean that literally. Who but a sociopath would get in front of a national audience and actually say such a thing, and what kind of "journalist" could sit next to her as she says it and not get outraged?
David Strom is taking Right-Wing Extremist Pills lately. I wonder who his connection is.
Here's this ugly little Chaka-looking Nepo Baby making this insane attack:
No weirdos here:
Lexi Boccuzzi says there is something to be said for, um, having babies and not self-extinguishing the species as the Childless Cat Ladies of the left would prefer.
The controversy over J. D. Vance's comments obscures a troubling reality: young people's reluctance to have children suggests a loss of hope for the future.
It's been hard to find a news outlet in the last week that hasn't run with a headline like "Why 'childless cat ladies' are JD Vance's biggest fear." While many of Vance's comments have been taken out of context, fertility, family, and childrearing have become deeply sensitive subjects, so the outrage is unsurprising. The most uncomfortable topics are often the most important. Young people's lack of desire to build families suggests a lack of hope for the future--an alien sentiment in the United States.
I saw this firsthand as an undergraduate at the University of Pennsylvania, home to many childless, soon-to-be elites. I wrote columns in our school paper expressing my concerns about hookup culture, transactional relationships, and the lack of prioritization of dating. These columns often received the most pushback. In a pre-professional culture like Penn's, claiming that marriage and family were our greatest contributions to society was often taboo, particularly for women. But why?
In my senior spring, I sat in a classroom of about 45 students discussing this subject. We had just read Motherhood by Sheila Heti, which asks, as Amazon puts it, "What is gained and what is lost when a woman becomes a mother?" Heti answers: you lose yourself. Many in the class applauded this conclusion. When asked, about half confidently said that they never wanted to have kids. Another 30 percent or so said that they were uncertain, citing fears of climate change, the desire to put their careers first, and concerns over their mental health. The common theme: "With everything going on in the world [and in my own life], it would be selfish to have children." Another way to frame it is to say that these young people just don't feel secure enough to have kids.