Good morning, kids. We'll get to the mostly unsurprising Super Tuesday results, as well as a few intriguing political items from the political landscape in a moment, but first, as is my wont from time to time, another item has popped up that is reflective of the cancerous rot destroying our society. More to the point, it's a prime weapon in the strangulation of any and all voices of opposition to the repressive tyranny that is fundamentally transforming America as it was meant to be into the Leftist version of Ape City. Oddly enough, it just crossed my mind that given what I'm about to link, that could be construed as racist.
A St. Louis television station is under fire after an anchor “mistakenly” described minority homeowners using an “outdated, offensive and racist” term.
Television station KMOV issued an apology for using the term on Feb. 26 while previewing a story about racial bias on home appraisals, according to reports.
“Tonight, colored homeowners are sounding the alarm when it comes to undervalued home appraisals,” anchor Cory Stark, who is white, said on air.
JD Sosnoff, KMOV vice president and general manager, and Stark tried to do damage control over the apparent slip-up as criticism grew over the cringe remark.
“It was in an original script as ‘homeowners of color’ and was inadvertently changed and mistakenly read on air,” Sosnoff said, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
The National Association of Black Journalists assailed the error, calling it “outdated, offensive and racist,” while noting St. Louis’ population is 43% black.
The organization said while there have been multiple apologies by the station, it wants employees retrained and wants KMOV to better recruit and retain black staffers.
Break in the action to note the disgusting, shameless Sharpton-Jackson "Justice Brothers" shakedown tactic and forcible Stalinist re-education brainwashing sessions for whitey. But wait, it gets better!
While St. Louis County NAACP President John Bowman condemned the incident, he doesn’t think there was offensive intent behind it. “Trust me, I’ve had enough experience dealing with people who intentionally show discrimination or racist behavior,” Bowman said, per the Post-Dispatch. “But I’ve interacted with Cory Stark, and at no time have I ever felt that about him.”
Well, that's mighty white of John Bowman, isn't it? But correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't NAACP stand for the National Association for the Advancement of COLORED People? A white anchorman gets reamed for saying "colored homeowners" instead of "homeowners of color." Pardon my stupidity but what's the freaking difference? I mean, really?!
And this race-hustling degenerate poseur Walter Smith Randolph from the NABJ flips his lid about how this incident somehow illustrates how anti-black racism is still to this day – 160 years after the Civil War, 60 years after the civil rights era, and 16 years after electing the first kinda-sorta black president – keeping y'all in chains. Why is there even a NABJ in the first place, let alone a Congressional Black Caucus or a Congressional Hispanic Caucus or any organization that divides people? Answer: it's the division, stupid.
The aforementioned difference is not in which words are allowed to be used and which aren't. It's WHO gets to decide which words are allowed to be used, context be damned. In this day and age, or more precisely in what should have been a more normal day and age, I'd never use the word "colored" or any racial epithet to describe someone's ethnicity, and certainly not as an epithet in and of itself. But the wild overreaction to what this anchorman said is illustrative of both the weaponization of language for political repression as well as the prolonged campaign of brainwashing that for at least three generations have convinced minorities that they are perpetual victims of whites – specifically non Democrat-Leftists – that the nation they live in is irredeemably racist and illegitimate based on its supposed continuous history of repression of non-whites, and most dangerous of all, anything is permissible in the redress of this grievance which is in point of fact a blood libel that will lead to disaster.
In the Biden [junta], anything goes.
So look who's out there representing the actual voice of the United States before international audiences in the agency known as U.S. Agency for Global Media, which oversees outlets like the Voice of America:
'Snow Roaches'James 'J.R.' Reeves is the Chief Information Officer and IT Director for USAGM, the federal agency responsible for global media coverage. He has many posts online referring to white Americans as "snow roaches" and racists, as well as celebrating the idea that white Americans can become the minority in this country.
'Snow roaches'? I learn something new every day. . . The bottom line here is that this is a freak who hates more than half the country and whose positioning near the top of the leadership of the U.S.'s flagship international communications operation, its voice and public relations arm, is very much an insult in itself to the country. and an international embarrassment. . .
. . . According to National Review, the public outcry did get him suspended, though . . . which means, he'll be back, and the statement didn't say whether it was a paid or unpaid suspension.
I would think that the Voice of America has a larger reach than KMOV-TV. In any case, how does a rabid racialist like this Reeves fellow ever rise to a position of some responsibility and import at what allegedly is a crucial governmental agency such as the VOA? Meh, how does one explain Claudine Gay? Melanin content is just one factor. The other is political disposition.
As puerile as hurling epithets when one cannot articulate a cogent argument to refute an argument, there's always good old threats of violence. And this example is not even from someone with a walnut-sized braincase but that of a pea. Black-eyed or otherwise.
“First of all, I’m just gonna say this: If I see a black person walking around with a Trump mugshot, I’m gonna punch him in the face,” the basketball star said.
Trying to temper Barkley’s remarks, King responded, “You don’t mean that.”
“Oh, I mean that sincerely,” Barkley reacted, adding that if he’s charged for assault, he would bail himself out “and go celebrate.”
“First of all, if I was at that [conference], I would’ve got up and walked out,” he continued. “That was an insult to all black people. To compare black history, where we’ve been discriminated against, to his plight.”
Charles Barkley's net worth is about $60 million, and he makes about $10 million a year (he himself admitted to blowing millions in his degenerate gamble days). Did he make that picking cotton or tobacco? Or was he simply a house you-know-what for Mark Cuban? If that's being the victim of discrimination, I'll put myself in chains and sing "Old Man River" until my vocal chords snap.
This fucking brainwashed ingrate wouldn't know discrimination if it hit him in the face. Yet he is kind of right about one thing. Colored Americans of color have been discriminated and abused for generations – by Leftist Democrats who immiserate them for political gain. A lot of blacks perhaps may not see it that clearly. Yet. But they know for sure that under Joey Sponge-Brain Shits-Pants they are suffering mightily and that when Trump was president, things had never been better. More of them employed and off the government welfare plantation than ever before.
And speaking of which, Trump won every state but Vermont yesterday and Biden lost American Samoa to a Bill Gates flunky.
NOTE: The opinions expressed in the links may or may not reflect my own. I include them because of their relevance to the discussion of a particular issue.
ALSO: The Morning Report is cross-posted at CutJibNewsletter.com if you want to continue the conversation all day.
Follow us on Twitter: @CutJibNews
Follow us on Instagram: @Cutjibnewsletter
TIP JAR : Your support helps keep the lights on and is truly appreciated. Note: We are on Stripe, not PayPal.