When the Demand for Hurricanes Exceeds the Supply
To support the climate change narrative, the National Hurricane Center has become more creative in identifying tropical storms. The more storms they identify, the more “proof” there is of climate change. So in recent years, pretty much any summer storm that has 39 mph winds - however briefly - will become “named,” if only for an hour or two.
In addition, a critical part of climate science fraud is altering historical weather data. There was a storm over the North Atlantic in January 2023 that was obviously not tropical in nature. But due to advances in creative meteorology since those long-ago days of four months ago, the politicized scientists at the NHC have now determined that it was a subtropical storm, allowing them to unleash ominous press releases – leading to ominous headlines - about hurricane season starting in January.
First Storm of 2023 Hurricane Season Formed in January, National Hurricane Center Says
Hurricane season got off to an earlier start than anyone thought after federal meteorologists found that a powerful storm that formed in the Atlantic Ocean in January was subtropical.
Hurricanes are a serious life and death matter. We cannot afford for the National Hurricane Center to be run by politicized frauds who can’t be trusted. This little stunt shows that we can’t trust the NHC.
Paris Climate Enforcers Are Targeting the Scofflaw Nation of China Vatican City
The Vatican City is the first country to be rebuked by the “compliance committee” of the Paris (Climate) Agreement.
The fate of the Earth hangs in the balance as we await the Vatican’s PowerPoint presentation.
Climate Karen would like to speak to the Pope’s manager.
Paris [Climate] Agreement’s Police Force Begins With Rebuke to Vatican
A committee set up to pressure governments into complying with the Paris Agreement has issued its first warnings, rebuking the Vatican City for not submitting a climate plan.
“Climate enforcer” is a natural role for people whose ultimate skill set is being a hall monitor.
[PAICC Committee Co-chair Christina Voigt] said that submitting NDC climate plans exerts “peer pressure to push up ambition to where it is needed in order to address the climate crisis.”
If you don’t believe that exerting peer pressure to push up ambition can save the world from global warming, then you are clearly a science denier.
To Ask the Question Is To Answer It
Natural Gas Feeds Half of Humanity; So Why Are We Trying to Ban It? [Mackinac Center – 01/24/2023]
Half of the people on Earth are alive today thanks to nitrogenous fertilizers made of and with natural gas. So why are governments at home and abroad scrambling to cut off humanity’s natural gas supply?
Coincidentally enough, the international elite have determined that there are too many people on this planet, and billions of you will have to “depart” to save the Earth from environmental apocalypse.
Don’t forget the terrifying words of Germany’s Federal Minister of Food and Agriculture, Cem Ozdemir, who stated “Hunger is no argument against bio diversity and protection of the climate.”
Ozdemir is speaking out loud what Schwab, Gates, et al hint at: ”Some of you will have to die, and that is a sacrifice we are willing to make.”
How Many Ways Are Wind Turbines Awful?
Wind turbines kill whales, mangle birds, dry out the soil, ruin the ocean floor, despoil natural vistas, produce noise pollution, and generate zero kw of reliable baseline energy. Yet they are embraced by environmentalists.
Here’s another way they are awful:
At least there’s starting to be a little pushback against the wind industry in some state legislatures.
For pilots flying over rural America, a string of red lights flashing along the horizon is a warning that there might be a wind farm ahead.
But for many residents on the ground, the lights are an eyesore that has ruined their view of the night sky and disrupted the bucolic stillness that defined their counties."
After years of loose regulation, lawmakers in some states are cracking down.
Just ban ‘em. If New York can ban gas stoves, then oil patch states can ban wind turbines.
What’s the Best Way to Weaponize a Dead Whale
Those of us who don’t like how green energy is killing whales have been “pouncing” and “seizing” on the connection between wind energy and all the whale carcasses piling up on beaches.
Apparently we have stepped our game up and we are now ”weaponizing dead whales.”
We Can't Let the GOP Weaponize NJ's Dead Whales [Asbury Park Press / USA TODAY Network – 5/05/2023]
New Jersey summers always include the pods of dolphins and whales jumping out of the water together. Now, they are returning deceased on our shorelines. These events are devastating, but have since morphed into a ploy against new offshore wind development.
Dead whales have become the poster children for South Jersey Republicans’ superficial environmentalism. While villainizing offshore wind energy, they have effectively diverted local environmental movements away from the larger crisis, and instead towards attacking a new technology that could benefit prosperity and wildlife alike.
While the unnecessary whale deaths bother me, I am genuinely enjoying watching left wing “environmentalists” become defenders of senseless whale killing.
And now the important question, what is the best way to weaponize a whale?
How about using a giant trebuchet. Or maybe the compressed air technique used in Jaws? Or maybe just let it rot in the heart of a blue city?
What are your ideas to weaponize dead whales?
[buck.throckmorton at protonmail dot com]