Dr. Simone Gold
@drsimonegold
WOW: A peer-reviewed study of 1.3 million women in the Czech Republic found that in 2022, vaccinated women had 33% fewer successful conceptions per 1,000 than unvaccinated women.
This is not speculation--it's data.
Time to wake up & ask hard questions. Humanity demands answers.
From David Strom:
From the outset, all the evidence suggested that COVID-19 was deadly to the old and infirm, and a bad flu for everybody else.
Focused protection for the vulnerable and developing a vaccine to alleviate the burden on them were policies that made the most sense. And given that only a small fraction of the population was especially vulnerable, when the vaccine was rushed out, it made sense to give it--even without long-term testing--to those at high risk of death.
Advertisement
Of course, that's not what happened. The risks were exaggerated, and the "protection" measures were mostly useless, and when the vaccine--not a standard vaccine, but a novel mRNA vaccine that was untested--the government tried to force everyone to take it.
It's as if you had asked public health officials to develop the worst possible policy measures and implement them. The damage done has been immense, and there has still been no reckoning.
It's a conspiracy theory, you guys. Don't do your own research. Only obey the State and State Media. They know what the truth is.
The study is here.
Below, the abbreviation "SC" means "Successful Conceptions," that is, pregnancies among women trying to have a baby.
The "vaccine" seems to have reduced women's ability to successfully become pregnant by a full third.
Estimates of the number of SCs for vaccinated and unvaccinated women are shown in Figure 1. During the study period (January 2021--March 2023), there were approximately 1,300,000 women aged 18--39 years in the Czech Republic, and the proportion of vaccinated women increased until reaching a steady state of around 70% of all women by the end of 2021 (Figure 1(a)). The Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) and Spikevax (Moderna) mRNA vaccines comprised 96% of all administered COVID-19 vaccine doses, with an 11:1 ratio in the use of these two vaccines.
Blue-shaded areas in Figure 1(b) show intervals between upper and lower bounds for the estimates delineating the actual SC rates.
In the graph below, the big, thick chungus parts of the graphs are estimates. The areas are big because this part of the graph shows the spread between the lower bounds of estimates and the upper bounds. They don't have full data to resolve this band into a single line.
However, past 2021, the actual data is known. The big-bands of estimated successful conceptions resolves into nice neat lines.
The estimated intervals for SC rates varied substantially for vaccinated women at the beginning of the study period where few women had been vaccinated, that is, representing a very low absolute number of SCs. Notably, at least from June 2021, monthly numbers of SCs per 1000 women were considerably lower for women that were vaccinated before SC, compared to those that were not. SC rates for women vaccinated before SC were generally lower than expected based on their proportion of the total population of women (Figure 1(a) and (b)).
<in june="" 2021,="" an="" increase="" in="" the="" rate="" of="" sc="" was="" observed="" for="" women="" unvaccinated="" before="" sc,="" and="" this="" higher="" maintained="" over="" subsequent="" 6-month="" period.="" during="" 2022,="" rates="" scs="" stabilized="" both="" that="" were="" vaccinated="" uncertainty="" estimates="" subsided.="" however,="" <b="">throughout 2022, SC rates remained about 1.5 times higher for women that were unvaccinated before SC compared with those that were vaccinated before SC (Figure 1(b)).
Unvaccinated women have successful conception rates 1.5 times as high as those of unvaccinated women. This just restates the finding that vaccinated women have 2/3rds the successful conception rate of unvaccinated women, because vaccinated women have 2/3rds as many successful pregancies, and unvaccinated women have 3/2nds (1.5 x) as many pregnanices.
How does the establishment, the Regime, and the Democrat-Media Party survive this?
This is, bizarrely, the plot of the British series Utopia, which was remade using American actors for Amazon. The Amazon series played with the disclaimer that the series was entirely fiction and should not be taken as containing any truth and should not cast doubt on the efficacy of vaccines.
I wondered why they ran that disclaimer. It turns out, because the show's whole plot concerned Pro-Mortalist elites -- elites who fear that the world has too many people -- creating a fake epidemic to get people to take a vaccine to prevent it.
The "vaccine" was engineered deliberately to reduce people's fertility, to solve the fake global overpopulation "problem."
People screamed that this entirely untested, experimental gene-slicing "vaccine therapy" could have serious consequences that were entirely unknown.
They were chased off the internet and subjected to government punishment.
"Trust us," they said. "We're the Experts and we're here to play savior."
Do I believe this is what happened here? No I don't, but I am very much beyond giving these viciously hubristic mad scientists the benefit of the doubt and I am perfectly willing to use this to pressure them into accepting the reckoning they richly deserve.
So you used fear and panic and propaganda to get your way? Then you can have no objections to us using these same tools to punish you.
You defamed people and threatened them with government force for defying your will? Fine, we can play that way too.