The WHO, who I'm told are Experts in The Science (TM), admits that there is no evidence that the abomination called "gender affirming care" has any medical or even psychological value.

The World Health Organization (WHO) announced that it would not be issuing recommendations on "gender affirming care" for children or adolescents, citing the lack of scientific literature addressing it.

The WHO is in the process of developing guidelines for the "health of trans and gender diverse people," but has declined to extend those guidelines to people under the age of 20, according to a Jan. 15 document released by the agency. Scientific findings on the long-term consequences of child sex changes are "limited and variable," according to the WHO.

"The scope will cover adults only and not address the needs of children and adolescents, because on review, the evidence base for children and adolescents is limited and variable regarding the longer-term outcomes of gender affirming care for children and adolescents," the document reads.

The WHO defines anyone between the ages of 10 and 19 as an adolescent, according to its website.

The great patriotic state of Texas and two conservative-leaning media outlets have moved for an injunction to stop the lawless, tyrannical Biden Regime from further implementing its "censorship scheme."

The Tuesday evening motion requested that the court immediately halt the Biden administration and top officials from funding or encouraging "the development or use of technology that targets in whole, or in part, Americans' speech or the American press," according to a filing. The Daily Wire, the Federalist, and Texas alleged in a December 2023 lawsuit that the State Department skirted the First Amendment when its Global Engagement Center office awarded funds to the Global Disinformation Index, a British think tank that the Washington Examiner reported feeds advertisers blacklists of conservative websites to silence disfavored speech, and NewsGuard, a New York-based company purporting to track "misinformation" online.

The way this shell game works is this: The government creates organizations, supposedly private but funded with taxpayer money, which will brand Regime-disapproved speech as "disinformation," then leans on companies to not advertise on sites that spread "disinformation."

NewsGard is a US government op. It brands conservative speech as "disinformation" and not fit for advertising.

"The U.S. Department of State through its Global Engagement Center is actively intervening in the news-media market to limit the reach of, the circulation of, and render unprofitable, disfavored press outlets by funding the infrastructure, development, and marketing and promotion of censorship technology and private censorship enterprises to covertly suppress speech of a segment of the American press," read a memo attached to the motion, which was submitted by attorneys for Texas and Ken Paxton, its Republican attorney general, as well as the New Civil Liberties Alliance on behalf of the two outlets.

Efforts by the plaintiffs to fight what they dubbed in a filing last year "the most egregious government operations to censor the American press in the history of the nation" come as House Republicans on the Small Business Committee continue to press the State Department to provide grant records as part of their broader "censorship" investigation.

I don't like baiting people, but this has to be covered: Trump, who counted Tranheuser-Busch as donors and earlier defended them, now declares that it's time to "give Bud Light a Second Chance."

He announces that we should end our successful boycott and successful action against a woke corporation just as (checks notes) he attends a fundraiser for his own benefit organized by a Tranheuser-Busch executive.

I seem to remember a highly, highly accomplished worldbeater calling himself "Sundance" who informed me, in the most authoritative and absurdly pompous way possible, that Ron DeSantis was a Globalist Establishment shill for the Corporate GOPe -- and a "Managed Principal," controlled by shadowy globalist corporate forces -- whereas Trump was rootin'-tootin' straight-shootin' populist Viking Hero who could not be compromised by mere money (because he so infamously avoids spending any of his own money and plainly finds it painful to part with his own money).

I'm not going to rub it in, but if you believed these lies, or peddled these lies, shame on you. If you feel embarrassed, you should.

So what's next? Defending his donors at DEIsney? Will we give up our opposition to DEIsney just because a few of their executives throw money at Trump?

BTW, I don't want to ever hear "but Sundance says" ever fucking again.

You know Trump pays influencers to say shit, right? Do you believe Pepto-Bismol ads when they tell you their 75% more effective than other medicines?

El Salvador's president fulfilled a campaign promise to lock up the criminals and even the crimelords and keep them in prison. He did this by constructing gigantic concrete prisons and just filling them with tens of thousands of (well-tattooed) gang members.

What a concept -- running on a promise, and then keeping it.

He just won a "landslide" re-election.

President Nayib Bukele of El Salvador, credited with driving down gang violence in the Central American nation, has been re-elected.

Preliminary results released after 70% of votes had been counted showed him securing a second term by winning 83% of the votes.

He had already claimed victory before the results were announced.

His popularity has soared following a crackdown on crime which drove down the country's murder rate.

Under his presidency, El Salvador has been transformed from one of the most violent countries in the world to one of the safest in Latin America.

Mr Bukele, a former mayor of the capital, San Salvador, has described himself as "the world's coolest dictator".

LOL.

Maybe the GOP should try this tactic of "doing the things you say you'll do." Might work!

So that's how elections go in countries with open, fair, and free elections.

On the other hand, some backwards, third-world countries do not have open, fair, and free elections, but instead have sham "elections" rigged by oligarchs: