Joe Biden's "own" White House staffers have cucked him, holding an "historic" vigil outside of the White House to protest his policies and demand that he impose a ceasefire on Israel.

Staffers and appointees of President Joe Biden's administration held a vigil in front of the White House on Wednesday to demand that the president call for a ceasefire in Gaza.

More than three dozen people, most donning sunglasses and masks to conceal their identities, participated in the evening vigil, according to media reports.

Former State Department official turned activist Josh Paul, who resigned in October over the Biden administration's approach to the Israel-Hamas war, addressed the crowd during the demonstration in Washington, D.C.

Newsweek reached out via email on Wednesday night to Biden's representatives for comment.

Even his own staff is revolting!

I mean, they were always revolting. But now they're openly insubordinate.

This exposes what a frail, weak husk of a pervert he is.

This is like when you reach to cup your own wife's breast but the bull you're paying to pleasure her slaps your hand away and makes you sit in the corner wearing a diaper and babbling "mummy's boy is a silly boy" over and over again, garrett tells me.

And you know who is supposedly pushing Biden to be "more sensitive" on the war and take a more Hamas-friendly, position? That's right, the Blowjob Czar, Kamala Harris.

Biden's getting cucked by 60 year old women now.

If you want to see the future of the Democrats' foreign policy direction, look no further than today's Politico report on Kamala Harris' influence on Joe Biden. According to their sources, the Veep's influence on Biden regarding the war in Gaza has already begun paying dividends. Their three sources tell Politico that Harris has pushed Biden to demonstrate more "sensitivity" to the plight of Palestinians, and to take a harder line on Israel and their war efforts:

In internal conversations about the war in Gaza, Harris has argued that it is time to start making "day after" plans for how to handle the wreckage of the war once the fighting ends, one senior administration official said.

One person close to the vice president's office said she believes the United States should be "tougher" on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu; she has called for being "more forceful at seeking a long-term peace and two-state solution," this person said.

And ... how's that going, anyway? Before answering that, read on to find out who's idea it was to start denouncing "Islamophobia" at at least the same pitch or higher than the ugly avalanche of anti-Semitic rhetoric and actions that emerged in the first days of the war:

In the immediate aftermath of the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel, which left more than a thousand civilians dead and hundreds more kidnapped as hostages, Harris urged Biden to make sure he condemned Islamophobia at the same time as he spoke out against anti-Semitism. The Washington Post reported last month that Harris "suggested" Biden add a line denouncing Islamophobia in his Oct. 10 speech on the outbreak of war.

Since then, Biden, Harris and other administration officials have grown increasingly willing to criticize Israel's approach to battling Hamas, including this week when the president issued a stark warning to the Israeli government about the potential political consequences of its ferocious military offensive.

The only surprising aspect of that catastrophically dumb advice is that Biden didn't think of it first. While demonstrations in support of Hamas and against the Israelis erupted on college campuses and urban centers across America, Biden made himself look out of touch with his focus on '"Islamicphobia" in his Oval Office speech. And of course, the White House sent Karine Jean-Pierre out to flog that for another couple of weeks too, until the White House press corps and the rest of the media began ridiculing the effort.

Good: Biden blames himself for Hunter's legal woes.

President Biden has privately expressed that he feels guilty about Hunter Biden's legal troubles, telling close associates that he believes his son wouldn't be facing federal indictments if he hadn't run for office in 2020, according to a report.

"In private, no issue is more likely to anger or sadden President Biden than attacks on his son," according to Axios, which describes people close to the 81-year-old president noticing that his "moods shift" when there is unpleasant news about Hunter.

Few in the president's inner circle "feel free to discuss Hunter's situation with the president" over fears that it could "prompt both fury and dejection," according to the outlet.

The Justice Department investigation into the 53-year-old first son has also "strained" the president's relationship with Attorney General Merrick Garland, the report notes, describing it as "frigid" after Special Counsel David Weiss brought criminal charges against Hunter for allegedly lying about his drug use when he bought a firearm and failing to pay $1.4 million in taxes.

People close to the president have "fumed" at Garland for granting Weiss special counsel status to investigate Hunter and have likened the attorney general to former FBI Director James Comey, arguing that both are "obsessed with the appearance of having integrity rather than just trying to make the right decision," according to the outlet.

Similar to the president's claim, Hunter Biden's attorney Abbe Lowell argued Monday that his client was indicted "because he is the son of the president."

It's a family of white trash scumbags that always dindu nuffin' and always thinks The Man is fixin' to frame them.

David Axelrod continues slamming Biden's chances of winning, calling Dark Brandon's polling "very, very dark."

"The Wall Street Journal was, you know, very, very dark from a Biden standpoint," he said. He continued, "Job approval down, ratings generally down, most of the comparatives with Trump, not good. And the one that I think was most alarming from my standpoint was when they asked if Biden's policies and Trump's policies when they were president were helpful to people.

"Only 23 percent of voters say Biden's policies have helped them personally while 53% said they have been hurt by the president's agenda. By contrast about half of voters say Trump's policies when he was president helped them personally, more than the 37% who said they were hurt. What I worry about you guys from a Biden standpoint is these are the kind of things you get where people are starting to rationalize their votes."

Mike Murphy, one of Axelrod's co-hosts, interjected, "Oh, look, they're ready to fire Biden, you know that's the problem. They just put out another photo op with the Bidenomics sign next to him."

They then went on to talk about a couple of CNN polls, one in Georgia and one in Michigan. The Michigan poll had Trump leading by 10 points. Axelrod said he'd heard about private polling which made him think the situation wasn't quite that dire. "But it's bad," he added.

I bolded the part about "rationalize their votes" because I don't know what it means, but Axelrod seems to think it's important. I'm going to take a complete guess and say it means something like: "Begin to construct a logical argument which reinforces the sentiment that has already formed in your gut, thus solidifying that changeable sentiment into a more stable and permanent thing." That sounds right, but I don't know if that's what he means.

But don't worry, the Fed is on the case! They plan to cut interest rates three times during the election year of 2024. Cutting interest rates causes the cost of borrowing to become lower (duh), which makes it easier to start businesses or buy expensive items, which results in a growing economy (usually). And higher inflation (sometimes).

So the Fed seems to be looking to give Biden a nice big lift just in time for election season.

Apparently "prices are down" and inflation is over. Did you know that? I didn't. Last time I checked, the rate of inflation had merely fallen to 3.1%, which means prices are "merely" rising at an annual rate of 3.1% now. Not falling.

But the Fed thinks that's job done.

And KJP says that means that prices are now "down" and the only thing left to fix is "insulin prices" and "junk fees" at the bank and in airline ticketing.

Chris Christie and Vivek Ramaswamey will not qualify for the next debate, which will be held by CNN. (I don't like that part.) This means that Nikki Haley would have to debate DeSantis one-on-one.

Suddenly she doesn't want to debate. She says it's because Trump won't be debating, but Trump has participated in any prior debate.

CNN held a Town Hall with Vivek Ramaswamy, and you'll never guess-- they would not allow him to speak a sentence without "fact-checking" him repeatedly.

Abby Phillips refused to concede that there were federal agents even present in the J6 crowd. Not that they caused the riot or they ringleaded it -- that they were even present.

And she would not just make an objection and then let him speak. She just kept interrupting him every time he attempted to make his point.

Obviously CNN does not do this to Democrats. On CNN, if you want to claim any false claim beloved by the left, that blacks are killed by cops at astonishingly high rates and at much higher rates than whites, or that transgender people are murdered at higher rates than white people, or that Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation, or that Trump colluded with Russia-- you go ahead, you make your point. The CNN bobblehead will just nod.

OK Boomer: