



Berkeley professor: Don't hire my awful antisemitic, pro-terrorist law students.
I teach corporate law at the University of California, Berkeley, and I'm an adviser to the Jewish law students association. My students are largely engaged and well-prepared, and I regularly recommend them to legal employers.
But if you don't want to hire people who advocate hate and practice discrimination, don't hire some of my students. Anti-Semitic conduct is nothing new on university campuses, including here at Berkeley.
Last year, Berkeley's Law Students for Justice in Palestine asked other student groups to adopt a bylaw that banned supporters of Israel from speaking at events. It excluded any speaker who "expressed and continued to hold views or host/sponsor/promote events in support of Zionism, the apartheid state of Israel, and the occupation of Palestine." Nine student groups adopted the bylaw. Signers included the Middle Eastern and North African Law Students Association, the Queer Caucus and the Women of Berkeley Law.
The bylaw caused an uproar. It was rightly criticized for creating "Jew-free" zones. Our dean--a diehard liberal--admirably condemned it but said free-speech principles tied his hands.
Weird how those "free speech principles" dissolve like dry ice when Riley Gaines wants to give a speech.
Or, the World's Most Dangerous Jew, Ben Shapiro.
The campus groups had the legal right to pick or exclude speakers based on their views. The bylaw remains, and 11 other groups subsequently adopted it.
...
The student conduct at Berkeley is part of the broader attitude against Jews on university campuses that made last week's massacre possible. It is shameful and has been tolerated for too long.
It's time for the adults to take over, and that includes law firms looking for graduates to hire....
Legal employers in the recruiting process should do what Winston & Strawn did: treat these law students like the adults they are. If a student endorses hate, dehumanization or anti-Semitism, don't hire him. When students face consequences for their actions, they straighten up.
If you are a legal employer, when you interview students from Berkeley, Harvard, NYU or any other law school this year, ask them what organizations they belong to. Ask if they support discriminatory bylaws or other acts and resolutions blaming Jews and Israelis for the Hamas massacre. If a student endorses hatred, it isn't only your right but your duty not to hire him. Do you want your clients represented by someone who condones these monstrous crimes?
Mr. Solomon is a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley.
Grifter, embezzler, and low-IQ charity hire Henry Rodgers, who larps as "Ibram X. Kendi" like he's in the world's most racist game of Dungeons and Dragons, is on the scent of a new grift as he brands the Israelis as Nazis.
No one ever said he was creative. Or cogent. Or good at anything at all.
The US gives money to the UN, and the UN immediately gives that money to Hamas and Hezballah.
The UN doesn't label these groups as terrorist groups so they give them our money. And we do nothing about it.
The Biden regime wants to give its terrorist allies directly, so it launders the terror-funding through the UN.
Iran-backed Hamas and Hezbollah are not sanctioned or labeled as terror groups by the UN Security Council
The U.S. has subsidized Hamas to the tune of $380 million since Biden took office and restarted funding to the UN's Palestinian refugee agency
Former U.S. Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley repeatedly pressed the organization to formally list Hamas as a terrorist group
U.S. taxpayer dollars are able to 'flow freely' to Iran-backed Hamas and Hezbollah because the United Nations Security Council has failed to label them as 'terrorists,' warn top security experts.
Hamas and Hezbollah are not sanctioned or labeled as terror groups by the UN Security Council. However, other well-known terrorist organizations Al Qaeda and ISIS have been officially designated, which cuts off their ability to get foreign assistance.
Richard Goldberg, senior advisor at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, tells DailyMail.com that U.S. taxpayer dollars to the UN are going directly into the hands of terrorists as a result.
That is especially alarming as Hamas in Gaza launched a brutal attack on Israel over a week ago, killing over 1,300 innocent civilians and at least 29 Americans.
But despite their horrific atrocities, including beheading babies and raping women, the Iran-backed terror group is considered 'legitimate' by the UN - which has cleared the way for the organization to receive worldwide assistance, says Goldberg.
Hamas and Hezbollah are not sanctioned or labeled as terror groups by the UN Security Council
'The UN considers Hamas a legitimate political movement, not a vicious terrorist organization. The same goes for Hezbollah. That means US taxpayer dollars handed over to the UN can flow freely into Hamas hands in Gaza, and they do every day through the UN's so-called Palestinian refugee agency,' Goldberg told DailyMail.com.
The UN has a 'Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East' (UNRWA) agency that works to support the 'relief and human development' of Palestinian refugees.
The agency received over $15 million from partnering UN countries in 2021 and it lists the United States as a 'top government donor' on its website.
Goldberg said that the Biden administration has given roughly $1 billion to the UNRWA, which spends about 38 percent of its budget on Gaza.
Therefore, the U.S. has subsidized Hamas to the tune of $380 million since Biden took office and restarted funding to UNRWA, he said.
Romney endorses Trump? Because he says DeSantis is a smarter authoritarian than Trump, and therefore, more dangerous.
From last week, but worth a mention for the laugh:
David Strom quotes from the LA Times' insane race-baiting.
PUERTO VIEJO, Costa Rica -- Filmmaker Jameelah Nuriddin was locked down in Los Angeles during the pandemic, watching as the nation convulsed in protest over the murder of George Floyd, when she had an epiphany: "America does not deserve me."
As a Black woman, Nuriddin always tried to work twice as hard as those around her, thinking: "If I'm smart enough, pretty enough, successful enough ... then finally people will treat me as a human being."
But as she grieved yet another unarmed Black man killed by police, she decided she was done trying to prove herself to a society that she felt would never really love her back.
So Nuriddin, 39, packed her bags and left.
She ended up in Costa Rica, in an idyllic beach town on the Caribbean coast that has become a hub for hundreds of Black expatriates fed up with life in the United States.
She now spends her days working for U.S. clients from chic cafes, leading healing ceremonies at a local waterfall and trying to figure out who she is, exactly, outside of an American context.
"It's like leaving an abusive relationship," she said of exiting the United States.
The expats forging new lives in Puerto Viejo are part of a wider exodus of Black Americans from the U.S. in recent years, with many leaving for reasons that are explicitly political.
"Political" reasons or explicitly racialist reasons?
Weird how these alleged professional writers frequently Don't Know What Wurdz Mean and make all these boo-boos Uzing the Wrong Wurdz.
Just so you know, she can say she's leaving the US to get away from evil whites, but if you channel Powers Boothe and say "Well... bye," you're a racist. The only permissible response is to fall to your knees and scream "No! Don't go! Muh Diversity! Muh Diversity!"
Louis CK, a multimillionaire who lives behind a tall wall, in January.
Another one from the Bee: