It's time to sweep all of the Soros "Prosecutors" out of office.

Nathan Hochman defeated incumbent progressive prosecutor George Gascón in the race for Los Angeles County district attorney as crime was seen as a top issue of the election cycle.

Hochman, a former federal prosecutor, campaigned as a "hard middle" candidate, rejecting both mass incarceration and the "public safety failure" of Gascón's liberal policies, which Hochman said led to increased crime and a lack of consequences for juvenile offenders.

"The voters of Los Angeles County have spoken and have said enough is enough of D.A. Gascón's pro-criminal extreme policies; they look forward to a safer future," Hochman said in a statement early Wednesday. "As D.A., I look forward to representing all of the people, whether they voted for me or not, since their safety will be my responsibility."

...

The FBI's preliminary data for 2022 had predicted that violent crime dropped by a slim 2.1% from 2021-2022. The FBI updated the data in October, however, and found that violent crime actually rose by 4.5%.

Meanwhile, California actually passed Proposition 36, which went over their progressive "representatives'" heads to stiffen penalties for theft and drug dealing. The "representatives" refused to criminalize crime, so the people had to resort to a ballot initiative.

Californians overwhelmingly pass anti-crime Proposition 36 measure that Dem Gov. Gavin Newsom strongly opposed

California voters approved by a massive margin a ballot measure to more harshly punish certain crimes -- with the initiative garnering a whopping 70.6% support with nearly 7.6 million ballots counted.

The outcome of the state's Proposition 36 reflected a backlash to light penalties for shoplifting and drug-related crimes -- and it passed despite opposition from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Prop 36 authorizes felony charges for possession of drugs including fentanyl and for thefts under $950 if the offender has two prior drug or theft convictions, according to the official summary of its provisions.

Baby steps.

Kamala refused to say how she was voting on proposition 36 -- she once again wouldn't answer an important question. She claimed she just wouldn't reveal her position 48 hours before an election.

She could have, of course, revealed it any time over the past year.

But our Brave Truth Tellers of the media just never asked her!

Vice President Kamala Harris is facing scrutiny from a California sheriff after refusing to say whether she voted for a proposition in her home state aimed at curbing the surging crime and theft in the state.

"California's Democrat leaders have long taken the side of criminals instead of standing up for crime victims and ordinary residents," Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco told Fox News Digital. "Proposition 36 will roll back some of the most harmful soft-on-crime policies California Democrats have enacted. It is the single most important thing on California's ballot this year, and will help clean up our streets and keep our neighborhoods safe.

"The vice president's reluctance to vocally support this critical public safety measure is yet another failure in a long career of failures when it comes to keeping our citizens safe."

Harris, a former San Francisco district attorney, California attorney general and U.S. senator before she was elected vice president in 2020, declined over the weekend to answer about how she voted on Proposition 36. The California ballot measure would reverse criminal justice reforms made in her home state in recent years.

"I'm not going to talk about the vote on that because honestly it's the Sunday before the election, and I don't intend to create an endorsement one way or another around it," Harris said. "But I did vote."