THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Sep 26, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic


NextImg:Of Course: Soros DA Alvin Bragg Gives Black Leftist Who Pummeled a Black Pro-Life Activst a Free Pass

Pro-life advocate Savannah Craven Antao -- a pretty woman -- was doing simple man-on-the-street interviews about abortion.

Pro-abortion lunatic Brianna J. Rivers -- a, get this, obese ugly woman with a low executive brain function and thus an inability to control her own outbursts of retarded violence -- violently smashed her in the face, out of the blue, during a fairly calm exchange.

So what Soros DA Alvin Bragg did -- the guy who brought 34 misdemeanor counts against Trump after the statute of limitations had run -- was reduce the charge from felony assault to a misdemeanor.

For hitting someone in the face.

And that's not all he did. He then failed to prosecute in a timely manner and then dismissed even the misdemeanor charge, using his deliberate refusal to prosecute as the grounds for a "speedy trial" dismissal.

Yes, he deliberately sat on the prosecution, then said he had to dismiss the charges because of the constitutional right to a speedy trial.


Collin Rugg
@CollinRugg

NEW: Pro-life advocate Savannah Craven Antao says charges against the woman who brutally assaulted her on camera have been dismissed by DA Alvin Bragg's office.

Craven Antao was assaulted back in April while conducting a street interview in NYC.

"Brianna J. Rivers was arrested and reportedly charged with felony assault," the pro-lifer explained.

"But after an interview with two prosecutors, I was informed that the felony had been downgraded to a misdemeanor."

"On July 23, 2025, I find out the prosecution simply allowed this misdemeanor to be dismissed on speedy trial grounds, apparently due to the prosecution's failure to file a certificate of readiness."

"My assailant, Brianna J. Rivers, continues to show zero remorse and make jokes about her act of violence toward me and other pro-lifers."

"Shame on you, Alvin Bragg."

They are literally endorsing violence against conservatives.

Infuriating.

Video: savannahantao / tt



Geoffrey Ingersol says enough is enough. If left-wing Soros prosecutors are giving their street troops permission to attack us, we'll just do what people have done throughout history, before the arrival of impartial law.

We'll take care of business ourselves. In a lawless city, you are responsible for your own safety.

His basic point is that people don't attack each other in the streets -- or we didn't, previously -- because the cost of doing so was too high.

But leftist DAs and Democrat politicians are demanding that their leftist street militias pay no cost at all for attacking people.

That means that people are going to have to impose those costs themselves.

Alvin Bragg's office dismissed a felony assault charge yesterday. That shouldn't be a shock to anyone -- nobody is more renowned for soft on violent crime prosecutions than Bragg. What is shocking though is in this particular case the act was caught on film. What's more, the assailant then went on social media and bragged about doing it.

Pro-life advocate Savannah Craven Antao was doing a man-on-the-street video in Harlem, New York, when she was abruptly and viciously assaulted by a woman she was interviewing.

Brianna J. Rivers, a brutish, hulking woman, socked Antao in the face twice the moment she was distracted.

This is dead-to-rights felony aggravated assault. It should result in prison time and probation.

Prosecutors initially downgraded the charge to a misdemeanor, then dismissed the charges altogether.

And the message couldn't be clearer.


How do we fix this? In corrupt legal scenarios, where the judges, prosecutors and even police are all a part of a rigged system, what do we do?

Choose violence.

We all know the government is not going to help you in your time of need. Especially a Soros-sponsored government.

Conservatives looking to peacefully assemble and publicly debate need to be realistic. Nobody is going to help you. In fact, they're going to encourage violence. They're going to excuse, justify and encourage it.

We saw as much with Charlie Kirk. They were practically begging someone to go after him, and when someone did, they quickly justified it.

Well, I think now that we know the extent of it, the time to go as lambs to the slaughter is OVER.

In real terms, this means: Bring security with you that's dying to dole out drubbings. I'm sure a fair amount of ex-cons who found Jesus loved Charlie Kirk. Maybe they need work?

Whatever works. We need to reinstitute the cost.

Now I gotta tell you: I think this is terrible advice for the individual.

If you beat the shit out of an antifa thug who threw a bottle of piss at you, guess who's going to jail if you're in a blue state or blue city in a red state? As the Proud Boys about that, who were absurdly overcharge for fighting back against an Antifa disruptor who attacked them.

I mean, socially, we might benefit from a few vigilantes sacrificing their freedom for the greater good, but believe you me, if a conservative decides to take out his own Street Reparations from a left-wing thug, he's going to prison for a long time. And he'll be sentenced under state law, with very limited possibilities for federal court review.

Ask Daniel Penny.

You'll notice that BLM and Antifa are much better behaved in red states, of course. Because they know they have no free pass for violence, and they know that citizens' rights to defend themselves will be upheld.

Steven Crowder started the "Change My Mind" debate format. He had to give it up, he says, because of constant death threats from Antifa and assaults (unpunished by leftwing courts):

And meanwhile...

Personally, it seems to me that it's the normies who have to arm up to protect themselves against the trannies.