Foreign criminals are much more important than American children, doncha know.

NYC channel 11, WPIX:

Thousands of migrants were evacuated from Floyd Bennett Field in Brooklyn to ride out a potential rainstorm on Tuesday night, officials said.

Approximately 2.000 migrants were moved from Floyd Bennett Field in Flatbush to James Madison High School on Tuesday afternoon, according to the Office of Emergency Management. Roughly 40 Department of Education buses were in the evacuation, according to the OEM.

The asylum seekers spent the night in the school's gymnasium before returning to Floyd Bennett Field on Wednesday morning, officials said. The field began housing about 2,000 migrants last year.

...

"The health and safety of migrants in our care is always a top priority, which is why we are currently overseeing the relocation of 1,900 guests from the humanitarian emergency response and relief center at Floyd Bennett Field due to an updated forecast with increased wind speeds estimated to be at over 70 MPH tonight," a City Hall spokesperson said in a statement.

Yes, we know that's your top priority. You make that more clear every single day of this living hell you're forcing us to live in.

This isn't just happening in Brooklyn (which voted 75% for Joe Biden).

As the Federalist points out, American children are being sacrificed to prioritize the Newer and Better Americans all across the country.

A slightly earlier mass influx of foreigners, mostly Somalis, to the Midwestern Twin Cities has helped turn parts of the city and its schools into no-go zones. A majority of staff feel unsafe in high-violence St. Paul schools, and only one in five students in that district are meeting math and reading benchmarks. Foreign-born English language learners are the least proficient in reading, with aggregate scores even lower than those of homeless kids.

Statewide, Minnesota kids' latest reading and math scores are the lowest on record. Kids don't learn anything in those schools except violence-justifying racial grievance ideology. At this point, they're not actually schools; they're juvenile detention centers. A key factor making them juvenile detention centers is Democrats' influx of illegally present foreign-born kids.

It's completely impossible for a teacher to help kids seriously learn when several in a classroom don't even speak English and arrive with little foundation for learning. Creating this situation is stiffing all the kids already here, who in cities like Minneapolis already enter school struggling. Further stretching already broken public institutions is not charity -- it's avoiding existing responsibilities.

The open border is rapidly replicating these circumstances across the country. The Biden administration is depositing pockets of "refugees" and fraudulent asylum seekers in flyover cities, making the border problem national. An Afghan "refugee" relocated to Billings, Montana was quickly charged with rape, which some Islamists consider a form of jihad. In Europe, "refugee" influxes have accompanied dramatic increases in rape. The Billings migrants also enter a city with already overcrowded schools.

Meanwhile, Brandon Johnson, Chicago's racist mayor who hates Brown People because he's trying to keep them out of his city, call Texas governor Abbott a racist for sending him the Brown People that Johnson claim to love and welcome with open arms. Via MSN:

MSNBC host Al Sharpton spoke to Johnson about the migrant crisis Sunday, noting that as it goes on it "puts a tremendous burden on [Johnson] and other Democratic mayors, I might add, many Black mayors have been the focal of this. In fact, on Thursday, New York City Mayor Eric Adams filed a $700 million lawsuit against 17 charter bus companies who transported migrants from Texas."

"What are your thoughts about the case, and is this an action you would consider taking as well?" Sharpton asked.

"You're absolutely right about the intentions of Gov. Abbott," Johnson replied. "He is attacking democratically-run cities, and particularly cities that are being led by Black leaders or leaders-of-color. This is unconscionable. I mean, it's a very raggedy approach. And quite frankly, not only is it reckless and raggedy, but it is evil-spirited."

John Sexton has been covering the Democrat-Media Complexes increasing panic over the immigration issue. He points out Politico's advice on the issue -- just stop talking about it, so that people forget about it.

The ceaseless, dire messaging is threatening Democrats in a pivotal election year, giving suburban New York Republicans another potent issue in competitive congressional races...

"If you listen to the mayor and you read the New York Post, you believe that everywhere you look in the city, there are migrants and asylum seekers on the street and you're stepping over them," said Alyssa Cass, a Democratic political consultant...

One person involved in a competitive Democratic campaign this year said the mayor's comments on the migrant crisis in recent months have "affected the way Democratic voters thought about it and made it more conservative how they were thinking about it."

Doesn't it just stink when the media's attempts to bury an issue fail?

Sexton looks at the various non-solutions Democrats are entertaining and concludes that none of these non-solutions are actually solutions. Which sounds obvious, but remember, we're talking about Democrats and therefore about people who are developmentally delayed.

Sexton now reports on not one but two articles appearing in the house organ of the Democrat Party, the New York Times, advising Biden to make inadequate and minor concessions on the immigration issue so as to deceive the public into thinking they're taking the issue seriously.

The NY Times has published two different opinion pieces, one yesterday and one today, essentially warning Joe Biden and the Democratic Party they need to move on immigration. The piece yesterday was written former Obama administration adviser Steve Rattner and Maureen White, an academic with expertise in "refugee issues." It opens with a very clear illustration of the problem. About 3.1 million people came to the US border last year. Around 600k got across the border without being caught. Of the the remaining 2.5 million who were caught, about 1.8 million ended up in the US, most of them claiming asylum. In all that's 2.4 million people who arrived last year who will be here for at least 5-7 years.

From there the authors make the case that something needs to be done. They propose a compromise...

I don't think you'll be shocked to hear that this "compromise" basically consists of the Democrat Open Borders plan, with the tiniest nods to Republican demands for border security.

This one concession is more substantial, but still inadequate:

But that's not enough. We must reduce the flow to the border, which will require making immigrating into the U.S. by such means more difficult. As Republicans have long demanded and Democrats are coming to see as necessary, our obligation under international law to provide asylum need not create chaos.

For starters, we should require asylum seekers to apply in Mexico or other countries, including their home countries, before they reach the U.S., reducing the incentive to travel here to gain entry during drawn-out proceedings. Both Mr. Trump and Mr. Biden have tried to accomplish this, but these changes have been mired in legal challenges and strained negotiations with Latin American countries.