Hillary Clinton has repeatedly lied to turn her absolutely-fraudulent campaign oppo research into a criminal investigation into Trump, claiming he was a Russian agent.
She began by denying that she had hired FusionGPS at all, and claimed that FusionGPS was just doing this "journalism" on its own. Of course, she hired FusionGPS, and she falsified her FEC filings to hide her payments to FusionGPS. She had her lawyers hire FusionGPS, and falsely claimed in filings that the payments were for "legal services."
She was never prosecuted for this although Trump is being prosecuted for something less serious than that in New York.
She and her media simps also claimed that FusionGPS' absurd "Steele Dossier" was "funded by Republicans." That's a lie. Some "Republicans" -- including, of course, Bill Kristol -- hired FusionGPS to dig up dirt about Trump and Ted Cruz, but they didn't know about or fund the Steele dossier bullshit. That was purely funded by Hillary for President, Inc.
Then her "computer scientists" created, out of whole cloth, the claim that the Russian Alfa Bank's computers were talking to the computers at Trump Tower. She had her lawyer, Michael Sussman, bring this nonsensical theory about a "secret channel" between Alfa Bank's computers and Trump's computers to the FBI, with Sussman lying about why he was doing so. He denied having Hillary Clinton as a client.
He was prosecuted for that lie, but of course a partisan DC jury let him off the hook.
The Hillary Clinton campaign also hid its responsibility for claiming that the DNC hack was done by Russians in cahoots with RUSSIA. They have claimed that the company Crowdstrike made this claim, but a new report from Racket News finds that "researchers" hired by Hillary Clinton were once again behind the disinformation and weaponization of government against Trump.
For over eight years, the world has been told that the United States government relied on a private firm called Crowdstrike to investigate the hack of the Democratic National Committee. Both former FBI Director James Comey and Special Counsel Robert Mueller referred to Crowdstrike as a primary source that Russian "conspirators hacked the DNC."
That narrative was troubling enough and the subject of questions at Congressional hearings. Attempts by members of the public to obtain Crowdstrike's analysis through FOIA have been shot down time and again owing to corporate "trade secrets" involved, and with Special Counsel Mueller's July 2018 indictment of those 12 Russians who are unlikely to ever be apprehended, key facts about their investigation were set to be sealed for decades.
New emails obtained by Racket through the Freedom of Information Act, however, suggest there is more to the story. Cyber researchers at Georgia Tech who were indirectly working with the Clinton campaign and Fusion GPS to produce the Alfa Bank claims, also appear to have influenced Special Counsel Mueller's investigation of the DNC hack.
...
There are strong indications that the same cyber researchers who were working with the Clinton campaign went on to work with the Special Counsel Robert Mueller team on the DNC hack investigation and the indictment of Russians. There's no doubt the government understood the connection to Clinton attorney Michael Sussmann, Sussmann was the one who had delivered the Alfa Bank allegations on thumb drives that the Clinton campaign paid for.
At the trial of Michael Sussmann, we learned that the FBI had received information from confidential human sources by early October 2016 who alleged that David Dagon was the author of the technical white paper making the claims regarding a secret communications channel between Trump and Russia via Alfa Bank, which the FBI was well on its way to debunking.
We also learned that the requests of FBI field agents involved in that investigation to interview David Dagon were denied by the FBI's leadership. Somehow, these same cyber researchers that had already provided their August 7, 2016 attribution analysis on the DNC hack, in addition to anonymously submitting the Alfa Bank claims through Sussmann, along with later submitting nonsensical Yota Phone allegations, went on to provide materials to Special Counsel Mueller on the DNC hack without raising any eyebrows.
The Mueller team went on to wipe dozens of phones, leaving now obvious questions of whether it was to conceal their contacts with the Clinton-connected cyber researchers. Whether intentional or not, the fact remains that none of the investigations since 2016 have revealed the role of the cyber researchers in the DNC hack investigation.
Racket News points out that if the US government ever had any intention of actually prosecuting these alleged RUSSIAN HACKERS, it would have to keep all relevant information because the Brady rule requires prosecutors to turn over information relevant to a defendant's defense to him.
Instead, they wiped all of their phones -- as if they never had any intention to prosecute these "Russian Hackers," and only wanted to hide their connections to the Clinton campaign.
It's nearly impossible to see how the government could meet its Brady obligations for a theoretical trial of the Russians. Presumably, all of the cyber researchers' work on the Alfa Bank allegations would be considered Brady material, going to the credibility of these cyber researchers as witnesses. At least some of that material has not been made available to the government or was destroyed.
And why would the government use these cyber researchers in one of the biggest and most important investigations in history, an investigation the media repeatedly assured us was being run above-board? With unlimited resources at its disposal, it appears the government instead allowed cyber researchers with controversial histories and political connections to influence their investigation.