


Garth brooks redefined masculinity when he double-down on selling Dylan Mulvaney Beer in his bar.
Now he's redefining masculinity more aggressively, Douglas-Emhoff-style.
A makeup artist sued Garth Brooks on Thursday, alleging that the country star raped her in a hotel room, and subjected to her to unwanted sexual conduct on other occasions, including sending her lewd text messages and groping her breasts.
The woman, identified as Jane Roe in the lawsuit, also accused Brooks of exposing himself to her on multiple occasions. She alleges that the trauma from the rape was so severe that she contemplated suicide.
"Brooks is desperate to prevent his millions of fans from learning about the horrific things he has said and done to a junior female employee who did nothing to deserve such treatment," the lawsuit states.
According to the complaint, Brooks filed a preemptive lawsuit last month against the woman in federal court in Mississippi.
The plaintiff in that suit alleges that the woman threatened to ruin his reputation by filing a sexual abuse lawsuit unless he gave her a multimillion dollar payout.
By the way, that's not blackmail. The law of blackmail specifically excludes threats made regarding legal action. I think the law probably specifies that the legal action must be bona-fide. But people literally threaten to sue each other unless redress is made every single day and if this were blackmail the prisons would be overflowing.
The federal suit was filed anonymously, describing the plaintiff only as a "celebrity and public figure who resides in Tennessee." The plaintiff, John Doe, states claims of attempted extortion, defamation and infliction of emotional distress.
...
The woman is represented by Douglas Wigdor, who has filed numerous #MeToo lawsuits against Harvey Weinstein and other powerful figures.
"We applaud our client's courage in moving forward with her complaint against Garth Brooks," Wigdor and his co-counsels, Jeanne Christensen and Hayley Baker, said in a statement. "The complaint filed today demonstrates that sexual predators exist not only in corporate America, Hollywood and in the rap and rock and roll industries but also in the world of country music. We are confident that Brooks will be held accountable for his actions and his efforts to silence our client through the filing of a preemptive complaint in Mississippi was nothing other than an act of desperation and attempted intimidation."
...
The suit alleges that she was at Brooks' home, when he emerged from the shower naked with an erection. She alleges that Brooks forced her to touch his penis, and urged her to perform oral sex. She refused, but continued to work for him.
In May 2019, she alleges that Brooks traveled to Los Angeles for a Grammy tribute, and booked a hotel where they would both stay. She alleges that Brooks violently raped her in the hotel room.
Afterward, she alleges that Brooks would often discuss sexual fantasies in front of her, would send her lascivious text messages, and would stare at her breasts. She alleges that he would pressure her to open her shirt, so that he could grope her breasts and then masturbate.
So, I imagine these texts exist. That doesn't mean her other allegations are true, but assuming there are inappropriate texts like this from Brooks, that scotches his "she's making it all up, she's a fantasist and extortionist" defense.
Again: If they exist. If they don't, she's lying.
Speaking of another woman-abuser, Kamala Harris's trophy husband Doug "the 'Hoff" Emhoff, I saw someone comment that she didn't know if the woman-punching allegations are true (I think they probably are, there are multiple witnesses), but she does know that Kamala Harris did not ask for evidence when attempting to lynch Brett Kavanaugh.
That's the Harris Standard of guilt, and her Beard Husband is guilty.