Of course. The law does not apply to the lawless left.

They are the aristocracy. They make the law, they do not suffer it.

The Association of American Law Schools (AALS) held a conference in July discussing how higher education institutions can continue to racially discriminate, following a ruling by the Supreme Court banning race-based admissions policies, according to videos reviewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

In June, the Supreme Court ruled that Harvard University and the University of North Carolina's use of race-based admissions policies is unconstitutional, halting the practice in all higher education institutions. In early July, AALS held a conference featuring several panels and speakers who suggested institutions use recruiting tactics, diversity statements as well as "data and analysis" to increase racial diversity.

...

"A lot of us have looked this problem square in the eye before, or this issue, and have come up with creative solutions to maintain the kinds of classes that we want," Cary Lee Cluck, University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law Assistant Dean, said during the seminar. "This is just another moment in time where we have to stop and reassess."

Kristin Theis-Alvarez, assistant dean of Admissions and Financial Aid at the UC Berkeley School of Law, noted Berkeley has a four-page personal statement that was a "direct outcome" of California's Proposition 209 in 1996, which put a stop to affirmative action in the state, according to the seminar. The school also allows applicants to submit an optional socioeconomic questionnaire and diversity statement rather than explicitly asking for race during the admissions process, Theis-Alvarez said.

And they're pushing the "personal statement" as the only criteria for admission because it allows black students to identify as such in official application materials. Previously, these schools claimed that Asians just didn't have "good personalities" and discriminated against them; now they'll just say "the personal statement was boring and didn't have the kind of passion I was looking for."

"In the past, applicants have included information about such things as gender identity, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, disability, socio-economic background, being a first-generation college student or graduate student, being a student parent a re-entry student, their geographic diversity or ideological diversity and others," Theis-Alvarez said.

Harvard, UMass, and Tuft's are all similarly scheming to subvert the law.

They're employing the same "tell us you're black in your personal statement and how being black means you're black and have black perspectives on matters of black diversity" tactic previewed at the conference discussed above.

Harvard, UMass and Tufts hopefuls are being asked to give details about their upbringing, community and what makes them 'diverse' on application websites

This comes at the advice of the Biden administration, which on Monday began urging colleges to use a range of strategies to promote racial diversity

In June, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that colleges could no longer factor in race when considering potential students, ending a decades-old policy

Top US colleges are continuing diversity drives when selecting students despite SCOTUS's ruling against affirmative action - in part due to advice given by the Biden administration.

Harvard, UMass and Tufts hopefuls are being asked to give details about their upbringing, community and what makes them 'diverse' on application websites in thinly-veiled attempts to skirt the legislation.,

I like black music, black athletes, and black comedians.

Am I diverse now?

Oh no I can't be, because I'm white. The "background" statement is just a signal to look at my picture and verify my race.

But this is the basic idea: We won't admit students based on race. Wink. We'll just admit them on their "diverse" background features and interests, which have nothing (wink to do with race.

...

Colleges can also consider how an applicant's race has shaped their personal experience, as detailed in students' application essays or letters of recommendation, the guidance states.

That's the Biden Administration once again defying the courts. The Supreme Court said they could not admit based on race, and Biden is telling them: Keep on admitting based on race. Just call it their "personal experience in living as a member of the black race."

Students applying to Harvard are now faced with a question about their background with the preface: 'Harvard has long recognized the importance of enrolling a diverse student body.

'How will the life experiences that shape who you are today enable you to contribute to Harvard?'

And high school grads hoping to secure a spot at Tufts are being asked: 'How have the environments or experiences of your upbringing -- your family, home, neighborhood, or community -- shaped the person you are today?'