Do you believe that this $4.9 million dollars was Kevin Morris' own money?
Or do you think he's just a funnel for money coming from billionaires? And China?
Because I think the latter.
Time to subpoena his bank records.
WASHINGTON -- Hunter Biden received a whopping $4.9 million from Hollywood lawyer Kevin Morris in a three-year period, according to an IRS agent who investigated the president's son for alleged tax evasion.
The revelation signifies a substantial increase in the known amount that Hunter, 53, got from his so-called "sugar brother" after the men reportedly met for the first time at a December 2019 campaign fundraiser.
IRS agent Joseph Ziegler shared the jaw-dropping figure and additional documentation Tuesday with the House Ways and Means Committee in a follow-up appearance as House Republicans near an expected vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry into President Biden for his alleged role in his family's foreign dealings.
Prior reporting indicated Morris paid about $2 million in tax debts for Hunter and purchased some of his novice artworks.
Morris' motives for helping the first son financially and the authenticity of their friendship have been debated by Republicans.
As part of his Tuesday testimony, Ziegler provided legislators an email showing that as early as Feb. 7, 2020 -- two months after they met -- Morris was contacting accountants on Hunter's behalf and warning them to work quickly to avoid "considerable risk personally and politically."
Morris is "loaning" Hunter Biden this money, you see.
Doesn't that sound familiar? People delivering money to the Biden Crime Family in the guise of "loans" or "loan repayments"?
Ziegler, who investigated Hunter's taxes for five years before he was removed from the case this year, said the first son's income from Morris -- at least some of it deemed loans -- resembled Hunter's practice of trying to avoid paying taxes on other income by describing it as loans.
Hunter Biden received a whopping $4.9 million from Hollywood lawyer Kevin Morris in a three-year period, according to an IRS agent who investigated the president's son for alleged tax evasion.
"Hunter appeared to follow a pattern of attempting to avoid paying taxes on relevant income. This first started with Hunter not reporting the [Ukrainian gas company] Burisma income in 2014 and allegedly falsely claiming that it was a loan to him," Ziegler said in his opening statement.
"He, again, tried to claim the millions in [Chinese] income earned from Hudson West III was a loan to him, which was refuted by the evidence and was not allowed by his tax accountants.
"This continued into 2020, 2021 and 2022, in which Hunter received approximately $4.9 million in payments for personal expenses, again in the form of a loan and gift from Democratic donor Kevin Patrick Morris."
...
It's possible that Morris gave even more in 2023 that's not included in the total.
You of course remember the criminal traitor Joe Biden vowing that there was an absolute firewall between himself, his office, and Hunter's "businesses" with China intelligence fronts and Russian gangsters.
And yet Joe Biden emailed Hunter's "business" partners 327 times, using pseudonyms, of course.
On Tuesday night, meanwhile, bombshell news broke that then-Vice President Biden used email aliases to exchange correspondence with Hunter's business associates like Eric Schwerin an astonishing 327 times over nine years. That "wall of separation" that Biden claimed he kept between his son and his overseas financial ventures appears to have been a figment of Joe's imagination.
The last line of the tweet read:
E-mail data released by IRS whistleblowers reveal Vice President Joe Biden sent and received at least 327 emails from Hunter Biden, James Biden, and Hunter Biden's business partner Eric Schwerin-- all from hidden alias emails.
The House Ways and Means Committee released the stunner Tuesday evening:
The committee obtained metadata from IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler that reveals Joe Biden used alias email accounts 327 times during a nine-year period -- 2010 to 2019 -- to correspond with his son, Hunter, and one of Hunter's key business associates, Eric Schwerin, among others.The majority of the email traffic took place while Biden was vice president.
The data shows direct emails between Schwerin and Vice President Biden increased during times when the vice president traveled to Ukraine. [Emphasis mine.]
Another lie that is now refuted is Biden's claim that when he blackmailed the Ukraine government into firing the prosecutor looking into Hunter Biden's "business partners" at Burisma, he was only carrying out the considered plan of the Obama Administration and State Department.
Key White House and National Security Council and State Department officials were caught by surprise when they learned in January 2016 that then-Vice President Joe Biden had abruptly changed U.S. policy to require the firing of Ukrainian Special Prosecutor Viktor Shokin as a condition for receiving $1 billion in U.S.-backed International Monetary Fund (IMF) loans, according to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) citing emails reviewed by The Epoch Times.
"There are State Department emails where they are, like, 'Oh!' surprised. There were people in the State Department saying, 'Oh, Biden says they aren't getting the money unless Shokin is fired,' and they are surprised, saying, 'Why did you do that, we didn't talk about this; we didn't plan that.' So it was a total change from the consensus where the State Department was," Mr. Jordan told reporters during a Monday question-and-answer session focused on the status of the House impeachment investigation of President Biden.
...
Mr. Jordan said State Department officials were surprised to learn of Mr. Biden's ultimatum to Mr. Poroshenko because it was previously settled U.S. policy to pressure Ukraine to root out official corruption that had plagued the country since it declared its independence from the former Soviet Union in 1991.
But until Mr. Biden did so, the U.S. had not made Ukraine's receipt of the IMF loan guarantees conditional upon Mr. Shokin's removal. Briefing materials reviewed by the vice president during his December 2015 flight to Ukraine included planning for him to sign the U.S. agreement to back the IMF loans, with no reference to firing Mr. Shokin.
A House GOP report concludes that corrupt Joe Biden's corrupt DOJ gave his corrupt son special corrupt favors to avoid prosecuting him.
House Republicans said the Justice Department deviated from "standard processes" and gave Hunter Biden "special treatment" in its years-long federal investigation into him.
The House GOP's findings are laid out in an interim staff report released Tuesday by the House Judiciary Committee, House Ways & Means Committee, and the House Oversight Committee.
...
The report points to Shapley and Ziegler's claims that the Justice Department "allowed the statute of limitations on certain charges against Hunter Biden to lapse, prohibited line investigators from referring to or asking about President Biden during witness interviews, withheld evidence from line investigators, excluded the investigative team from meetings with defense counsel, and tipped off defense counsel about pending search warrants."
...
The committees found that the Justice Department and FBI "afforded special treatment" to Hunter Biden. The report cites witness testimony, which revealed that there was a "delicate approach used" during the Hunter Biden case. Those officials described the probe as "sensitive" or "significant."
"Evidence shows Department officials slow-walked the investigation, informed defense counsel of future investigative actions, prevented line investigators from taking otherwise ordinary investigative steps, and even allowed the statute of limitations to expire on the most serious potential charges," the report states. "These unusual -- and oftentimes in the view of witnesses, unprecedented -- tactics conflicted with standard operating procedures and ultimately had the effect of benefiting Hunter Biden."
The House is expected to elevate the probe from an impeachment "inquiry" to an impeachment "investigation." If I understand this right, an "inquiry" is not really a formal impeachment proceeding, but is something the Congress sort of made up as preliminary step to an actual investigation. Voting on an "investigation" would make this a formal constitutional exercise and possible prelude to impeachment.