You probably all know this, because I know you all subscribe to Pink News*, but the Hero who made a gay pornographic film of him railing another dude up the Freedom Trail and then posted it in a public forum for discussing gay men in politics (and politicos inside gay men) was canned.
Well we already saw that he had been canned, the new news is that he was subsequently fired.
A US Senate staffer allegedly caught filming himself having sex in a Judiciary Committee hearing room no longer has his job, Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Maryland) said on X.
"Aidan Maese-Czeropski is no longer employed by the U.S. Senate. We will have no further comment on this personnel matter," a Cardin spokeswoman told The Post.
Maese-Czeropski, a 24-year-old legislative aide, was accused of posting a video of himself in flagrante delicto with another man on a public X account. His face appeared to be clearly visible, according to The Spectator, which first broke the story Friday.
The roughly eight seconds of intercourse allegedly took place in the same room where nominees to the Supreme Court are grilled by senators and where former FBI boss James Comey once testified about alleged Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Graphic video of the moment was published by The Daily Caller Friday evening.
...
Maese-Czeropski previously was featured in an ad for President Biden -- earning a shoutout from his mother's now deleted X account.
Of course.
If you're not grossed out enough yet, this next quote should about do it:
...
The same year, he apparently wrote on the payment platform Venmo, "I want Joe Biden to spit in my mouth."
You probably also know this, and even if you didn't know it you would have guessed it, but he immediately hissed that he was being discriminated against because of "who I love."
"This has been a difficult time for me, as I have been attacked for who I love to pursue a political agenda," he wrote. "I love my job and would never disrespect my workplace."
What were you doing, then? Christening the room with your nasty effluvia?
People have gone to prison for "violating the sanctity of the Congress" by sitting in the Speaker's chair.
Do you think he'll be prosecuted?
The Post reported:
The United States Capitol Police launched a probe into potential criminal violations after the video began circulating.
They have to say that but I very much doubt it. Gay sex became sacred around Year 5 of the First Gay President, Barack Hussein Obama.
Jonathan Turley says there's a basis for prosecution, but I have sneaky suspicion a Specific Intent element will be read into the criminal statutes to protect this Hero of Love.
Staffers have access into such rooms, but the question is whether this unofficial use would constitute trespass. It also uses an official area for personal purposes, though it is not clear if there were any commercial benefits garnered from the video found on various sites.
One obvious criminal provision under the D.C. code is Section 22-1312 for lewd, indecent, or obscene acts:
"It is unlawful for a person, in public, to make an obscene or indecent exposure of his or her genitalia or anus, to engage in masturbation, or to engage in a sexual act as defined in sec. 22-3001(. It is unlawful for a person to make an obscene or indecent sexual proposal to a minor. A person who violates any provision of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in sec. 22-3571.01, imprisoned for not more than 90 days, or both." The question is whether this is "in public" in a locked committee room -- any more than sex in a congressional office after hours would be viewed as "in public."
There are also provisions concerning the misuse or damaging of government property such as Section 1361, which protects "any property" of the United States from willful depredation or attempted depredation. "Depredation" is defined as the act of plundering, robbing, pillaging or laying waste. However, mere possession of such property is not viewed as depredation. United States v. Jenkins, 554 F.2d 783, 786 (6th Cir. 1977).
All very interesting but we know that the "legal imagination" is only deployed to think of exciting new ways to prosecute Republicans or pro-life protesters or just some parents who don't like that their children are being encouraged to transition.
There was also a hoo-hah over the weekend about a staffer yelling "Free Palestine!" at Rep. Max Miller. Turns out, that was also this Love Is Love #Winner.
Now, I thought that the controversy about that was complete bullshit. We cannot become SJWs on this issue. People are allowed to express views to Jews that Jews don't like. I don't agree with "Free Palestine!" as a motto, of course, but this degenerate has a right to say it, and yes, he even has a right to say it to a Jewish person. Especially given that the Jewish person in question is a United States Congressman with not-insignificant influence over the policies of the US. People are allowed to petition their representatives, or any representatives, even those who do not directly represent their district.
Signing up for the proposition that Jews should be protected from any speech they don't like signs us up for the entirety of the speech code system.
I guess he realized he had ended his career (for about two years, which is the most a leftwinger is ever punished for) and decided to really explore the studio space.
* I read a book over the weekend that told me that bothering an audience really drives engagement.