The FBI put out the word that Crooks' social media accounts contained "extreme anti-semitism" and "anti-immigrant" sentiments, suggesting, falsely, that he was a right-winger.
These writings are from 5-6 years ago, when he was a 14/15 year old teenager.
What about his more recent writings?
Well, he's an extreme hardcore Democrat and Biden supporter.
But of course the FBI suppressed that information.
Andrew Torba
@BasedTorba
BREAKING: The FBI is now claiming that the Trump shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks had an unspecified "social media account" in 2019/2020 (when he was 14/15 years old) that posted "anti-immigrant and anti-semitic" content.
This is not consistent with Gab's understanding of the shooter's motives based on an Emergency Disclosure Request ("EDR") we received from the FBI last week for the Gab account "EpicMicrowave" which, based on the content of that EDR, the FBI appeared to think belonged to Thomas Crooks.
Many, particularly regime media reporters, have doubted Gab's claims that this request existed. Normally we don't confirm the existence or content of law enforcement communications. In this instance we had to make an exception due to the overwhelming public interest in disclosure and transparency.
As a courtesy to law enforcement, we are not going to post the entire request. This is the first page of that request.
The story is this: the account for which data was requested was, UNEQUIVOCALLY, pro-Biden and in particular pro-Biden's immigration policy.
To the best of Gab's knowledge, as of 2021, Crooks was a pro-lockdown, pro-immigration, left-wing Joe Biden supporter.
People need to go to prison. I'm tired of this.
Even the Deep State cucks we elect to pretend to represent our interests
are finally getting sick of the FBI's neverending stream of disinformation.
As the Senate holds its first hearing into Donald Trump's shooting, some lawmakers are simmering over both the FBI director's suggestion the former president may not have been wounded by a bullet and the Secret Service's failure to get him off stage despite nearly 100 minutes of red flags about the would-be assassin.
Last week, FBI Director Christopher Wray's testimony to the House Judiciary Committee raised confusion around whether or not the bureau believed Trump was struck by a bullet. Wray told the committee that "with respect to former President Trump, there's some question about whether or not it's a bullet or shrapnel that ... hit his ear."
That statement drew a rebuke from Trump himself, and eventually the FBI clarified the former president had indeed been wounded by a bullet.
The reversal did little, however, to assuage critics, including one of the senators participating in Tuesday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing with FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate and Acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe Jr.
"We expected the Mainstream Media and the Far Left to try to rewrite history of what happened on July 13, but the American people got to see how far the rot within the Biden-Harris administration goes when the FBI Director lied under oath trying to downplay whether a bullet actually struck Donald Trump," Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., told Just the News in a statement.
"The fact that our own FBI director doesn't know what a bullet is- or refuses to tell the truth under oath- further highlights why we need to clean house at these politically charged agencies," he added.
The FBI did not respond to a request for comment from Just the News.
Another senator on the committee, Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa, also raised dramatic questions about why Trump wasn't taken off stage early, producing an extensive timeline showing authorities knew about concerns about the would-be assassin Thomas Crook for nearly 100 minutes before bullets were fired.
See the article for Grassley's timeline of Secret Service willful incompetence.
We need a Regime Fire Sale -- everything must go.