


These are sales outside of bars and restaurants -- from liquor stores and grocery stores.
Though I can't imagine why the sales would be any better in bars or restaurants, where people can see you drinking the Transgender Cocktail.
The Dylan Mulvaney controversy continues to hurt Bud Light.
Beer Business Daily reported Sunday that Bud LIght's off-premise sales volume--the amount of beer sold outside of restaurants and bars--was down 26.1% from a year earlier in the week ended April 22, based on scan data. Volumes were down 21.1% in the prior week, while so far this year, Bud Light volumes are down 8%.
The figures include sales at grocery stores, convenience stores, and liquor stores.
"The shocking deterioration of Bud Light Blue's market share continued apace through the third week of April -- and actually somehow worsened. We've never seen such a dramatic shift in national share in such a short period of time," Beer Business Daily wrote on its website.
Meanwhile, the transgender who is attempting to make "pedophile" a protected legal category is hissing a lot of slurs at people for pointing out what he's trying to do.
Except there's no lie. As Twitchy notes, this transgender is attempting to have the bolded portion of the below law struck from Minnesota's code:
Subd. 44. Sexual orientation. 'Sexual orientation' means having or being perceived as having an emotional, physical, or sexual attachment to another person without regard to the sex of that person or having or being perceived as having an orientation for such attachment, or having or being perceived as having a self-image or identity not traditionally associated with one's biological maleness or femaleness. 'Sexual orientation' does not include a physical or sexual attachment to children by an adult.
So the first part of the bolded language attempts to remove transgenderism from the category of "sexual orientation." I guess that's true. It's not an orientation, it's a delusion about one's actual sex.
The second part seeks to exclude pedophiles from protection under the "sexual orientation" definition, by stating that sexual orientation does not "include a physical or sexual attachment to children by an adult."
I think this monster is probably claiming that he just wants to break any link between sexual orientation and pedophilia, but the actual thing he's doing is making pedophilia a legally-protected type of sexual orientation, because he's trying to tear that restriction out of the current law.
Aaron Walker writes:
In all frankness, the definition is a total mess talking about having an attachment to a specific person. We tend to think a judge would still get it and realize this is about preferences in partners by sex. But it's not so clear that a judge with an agenda couldn't interpret it to protect pedophiles. In that case, a No Pedo clause is useful. Furthermore, by removing the language, the courts might interpret that as a signal that the legislature is at least agnostic about protecting child molesters.
It is also useful in preventing litigation. With a No Pedo clause, there is probably no lawyer in Minnesota who would be willing to argue that pedophiles are protected by their states' civil rights laws. Take it out, and they might see just enough of a chance to waste everyone's time. That raises the cost of firing a pedophile and thus might make employers less wiling to do it.
But most crucially, there is no downside to leaving the No Pedo clause in this statute. None. As we say about guns, better to have it and not need it, than to need it and not have it.
Leigh Finke is, get this, attempting to get Gays Against Groomers cancelled and, who knows, prosecuted:
Leigh Finke
@leighfinke
The reality of this organization is well known. They incite violence and profit from it. There is no justifiable argument for any elected official in America to endorse or ally with a group that is known to act in such a manner against political opponents.
And yet the MN GOP is amplifying this hatred. So much so that during the G@ys Against Gr00mers interview with Alpha News reporter Liz Collin, the group has stated they will be opening a chapter in Minnesota.
If you welcome hate, it will take root.
The nature of this organization is clear. The purpose of their work is clear. It is my sincere hope that everyone can recognize and reject the work of this group and speak out against them henceforth.
They do not hide who they are.
They don't hide who they are, huh, "Leigh"? Weird, you don't seem to be hiding what you are, either.
I mean, except for the whole "pretending to be a woman" thing.
Dude, not even close.
This is another example of a transgender finding the most stereotypical trait of women and imitating that stereotype to the max. Some super-feminist women never stop talking about Planned Parenthood and abortion? Okay, I'll show that I'm a woman by never shutting up about Planned Parenthood and abortion, despite the general rule on the left that Men Should Listen on Abortion, Not Talk.
I'm a real gal!