No doubt all of these emails were discussions of the weather.
President Biden sent or received up to 82,000 pages worth of private emails while serving as Barack Obama's vice president, the National Archives disclosed late Monday as part of a lawsuit brought by a conservative organization.
The Archives revealed that the trove of correspondence spanned all eight years of Biden's vice presidency and included messages to or from three shadow email addresses: "robinware456@gmail.com," "JRBWare@gmail.com" and "Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov," according to a joint filing with the Georgia-based Southeastern Legal Foundation.
"The fact that as vice-president, Joe Biden sent 82,000 pages of emails from alias email addresses is shocking," Southeastern Legal Foundation General Counsel Kimberly Hermann told The Post.
"The American public has a right to know what is in those emails. SLF remains hopeful that now that we have confirmed that the emails exist, NARA will fulfill its legal obligation and produce them in a timely and transparent manner."
It is unclear what topics are covered in most of the emails or who else was looped in on the messages.
I already told you, he was only speaking about "the weather." Possibly also wedding plans and yoga routines.
Margot Cleveland writes that "Trump appointee" and Very Special Counsel David Weiss had thoroughly vetted evidence of Biden's corruption in hand -- and covered it up.
The Delaware U.S. attorney's office received a detailed briefing that established the FD-1023 implicating Hunter and Joe Biden in a Ukrainian bribery scandal was not Russian disinformation and was not sourced to Rudy Giuliani, according to a transcribed interview of former Pittsburgh U.S. Attorney Scott Brady. Yet the Delaware U.S. attorney's office seemingly ignored the work undertaken by the Pittsburgh office and acted with willful blindness to the evidence implicating the now-president and his son.
Last Monday, Brady sat for a transcribed interview before the House Judiciary Committee. Over the course of some six hours of questioning, the committee elicited testimony revealing the Pittsburgh office's diligence in tackling the task given by former Attorney General Willam Barr: to screen evidence presented to the Department of Justice related to Ukraine.
The public has known for some time, thanks to Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and IRS whistleblowers, that the Pittsburgh-based U.S. attorney's office had provided the Delaware office information about an FD-1023 that summarized a "highly credible" confidential human source's reporting that Hunter and Joe Biden pressured Ukrainian energy company Burisma to pay them each $5 million in bribes.
More recently, IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley revealed that Delaware Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) Lesley Wolf had refused to accept a briefing from the Pittsburgh office until ordered to do so by Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General (PADAG) Rich Donoghue. According to Shapley, Wolf wanted nothing to do with the Pittsburgh-based U.S. attorney's office because she believed that no information from that office could be credible, having, in her mind, originated from Giuliani.
However, the FD-1023 was unconnected to Giuliani. And Brady's testimony, a transcript of which The Federalist has reviewed, confirms the briefing to Wolf made that point clear. Brady testified that in briefing Wolf, his lead AUSAs told her the FD-1023 "was from a credible CHS that had a history with the FBI, and that it was not derived from any of the information from Mr. Giuliani." Further, in the briefing, the Pittsburgh AUSAs informed the Delaware U.S. attorney's office they believed the FD-1023 had indicia of credibility that merited further investigation.
Brady's testimony also revealed many other facets of the briefing. For instance, Brady explained it was "a substantive briefing" of the information his team had screened and had concluded was credible -- or had some indicia of credibility -- and which they "thought would be of interest to them or that they should investigate further..." Brady reiterated that in the briefing, the Pittsburgh AUSAs shared information they had vetted that they believed "required further analysis, further investigation, including using the tools of a grand jury," and that included the FD-1023.
...
The Pittsburgh-based team of prosecutors also identified many potential witnesses related to Ukrainian corruption, Brady testified, with some in Ukraine and others in the United States. Brady explained his investigators interviewed some state-side witnesses, confirming that the screening process went much beyond interviewing Giuliani.
Significantly, Brady explained that in screening the evidence, his office vetted the FD-1023 and the CHS "against known sources of Russian disinformation." To conduct that analysis, his team worked with the Eastern District of New York. "It was found that it was not sourced from Russian disinformation," Brady told the House Judiciary Committee.