THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 3, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
Ace Of Spades HQ
Ace Of Spades HQ
28 Sep 2023


NextImg:Biden's Bagman Brother James Biden Tells FBI That He Was Trying to Get the US Government to Allow the Chinese Company CEFC Gobble Up American Energy Companies... Even Though He Knew the Company was Controlled by Chinese President Xi

KanekoaTheGreat
@KanekoaTheGreat


BREAKING - President Joe Biden's brother, James Biden, told FBI agents that Hunter Biden and the Biden family attempted to help a Chinese energy company purchase U.S. energy assets while believing the Chinese company's chairman was directly tied to Chinese President Xi Jinping.

James Biden told the FBI in an interview last year about efforts by him and Hunter Biden to help CEFC China Energy buy a liquid natural gas facility on Monkey Island off the coast of Louisiana, according to explosive new documents made public Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee.

"James B noted that RHB [Robert Hunter Biden] portrayed CEFC to him as Chairman Ye was a protégé of President Xi," FBI agents wrote in the report.

Last October, the @MarcoPolo501c3
Report on the Biden Laptop revealed that President Xi Jinping, whom Hunter and his business partner referred to as "#1" and "no 1" in text messages, personally approved of the business partnership between CEFC China Energy and the Biden family.

Hunter and James Gilliar, his business partner, alluded to President Xi's involvement in approving meetings and ownership shares on two separate occasions.

On May 16, 2017, Gilliar told Hunter business partner Tony Bobulinski: "As I know chairman [Ye Jianming] will come to meet VP [Joe Biden] if he gets approval from no 1 [Xi Jinping]..."

The following day, Bobulinski, who later confirmed that "#1" and "no 1" referred to President Xi, expressed concerns about the Bidens potentially overruling him on corporate decisions.

Hunter responded, "TONY that is what Zang implied - they are both [Zang Jianjun and Ye Jianming] coming to be MY partner to be partners with the Bidens. He [Zang Jianjun] has implied that the #1 [Xi Jinping] has made that clear and available to him."

In other words, the Bidens were paid millions by their Chinese energy partners, effectively operating as unregistered foreign lobbyists, in a business partnership personally approved by Chinese President Xi Jinping, which leveraged the Biden family's connections within the U.S. government to assist China in acquiring U.S. energy assets.

Just a few years ago, these actions by a President and his family would have been considered treasonous.

His tweet is here, with screncaps of the supporting documents.

Meanwhile, the media is engaging in wilful, deliberate misinformation.

Jonathan Turley's opening statement opined that while there was not enough evidence to impeach Biden at the moment, there was ample evidence to begin an impeachment inquiry, which, of course, is precisely what these hearings are.

Take a guess how the media "reported" this.



Scott Coleman
@bandphan


"I do not believe that the current evidence would support articles of impeachment... But I also do believe that the House has passed the threshold for an impeachment inquiry." Pretty sure that adds the important context missing.


(((Aaron Walker)))
@AaronWorthing

You don't even need to add that context. Last I checked, Rubin is a lawyer. If she doesn't know what the purpose of an investigation is, if she doesn't understand that you don't need proof to start an investigation, if she doesn't understand that the purpose of an investigation is to gather evidence that might add up to proof, then she should turn in her bar license

Which is not to say you're wrong, but we don't even need to go there. She should already understand what the context is

If the media can "report" this level of intentional disinformation, can I claim that the below post by a Brain-Damaged Hobo represents his real endorsement of the impeachment inquiry, or nah?