Remember when cars were cars? When driving felt like driving, not swiping through a tablet bolted to a plastic coffin on wheels. Those days are gone.
We used to slide behind the wheel of machines that understood their purpose. Steel and chrome beasts that started with a turn of the key and asked nothing more than gasoline and the occasional oil change. The dashboard had knobs you could feel in the dark, buttons that clicked with authority, and yes, cup holders that held cups.
We now live in the age of touchscreen tyranny, where opening your glove box requires navigating through digital menus like you’re ordering takeout. Climate control has become a software experience. Even the simplest task feels like rebooting a plane mid-flight. (RELATED: Longing for the Era of Economy Cars and Real Fuel Efficiency)
Cup holders are now a deal-breaker in car purchases. Not because they’re absent, but because they can’t adapt to our container obsession. We’ve moved beyond the simple soda can. Everyone’s hauling around their personal hydration arsenal. Tumbler cups that could double as small buildings, water bottles shaped like medieval weapons, coffee containers engineered by NASA.
The manufacturers thought they’d solved this puzzle years ago. Standard size, standard depth, problem solved. Then came the reusable container revolution, and suddenly their carefully calculated holes became obsolete. According to a recent report by J.D. Power, owners are genuinely frustrated that their $50,000 vehicles can’t accommodate the diverse ecosystem of beverages they’re bringing aboard.
The absurdity of it all warrants some attention. We’ve created cars that park themselves, navigate traffic autonomously, and connect to satellites orbiting Earth. Yet, we can’t design a receptacle that adjusts to different cup sizes. This is where we are as a civilization.
To compound matters, physical controls are being systematically eliminated. Those reliable, tactile friends that served us faithfully for decades are disappearing like witnesses in a mob trial. Everything must flow through the sacred touchscreen.
Sometimes the best tech is the thing that just works. A button that clicks. A cup holder that holds.
Want to adjust the temperature while driving? Good luck. “Customers are having to tap and swipe through multiple screens to access key vehicle functions,” notes a senior director at J.D. Power. We’ve turned basic car operations into a mobile gaming experience, except the stakes involve hurtling down highways at highway speeds.
The irony cuts deep. We’re making cars more dangerous in the name of innovation. Drivers are forced to take their eyes off the road to perform tasks that once required muscle memory and a simple button press.
The irony doesn’t stop at safety. The problem worsens the more you spend. Premium vehicles cost more and break more. The data doesn’t lie: luxury brands average 4.2 more problems than their mass-market counterparts. We’re paying extra for the privilege of additional frustration.
The culprits are the “non-traditional automakers.” In other words, tech companies cosplaying as car manufacturers. They’re so obsessed with disrupting the industry that they’ve forgotten cars need to function as cars first and smartphones second. Electric vehicles were supposed to simplify everything. Fewer moving parts. Cleaner operation. The future of transportation. No oil changes, no spark plugs, no timing belts. Just seamless, silent motion. Instead, we’ve created a new category of automotive chaos. Simplicity was promised. Complexity was delivered.
Plug-in hybrids are now the most problematic vehicles on the road, with 237 problems per 100 vehicles. Designed to offer the best of both worlds — electric efficiency and petrol backup — they’ve instead delivered the worst of both systems. Two powertrains, double the failure points. Sadistic software. Sensitive battery management systems. Expensive repair costs. The very technology meant to save the planet is currently the most likely to leave you stranded on the side of the road, waiting for a tow and wondering why you didn’t just stick with a reliable combustion engine.
New car launches are experiencing their highest problem rates since 2020. Only two out of 18 new models perform better than their segment average. The rush to market has trumped the commitment to quality. Manufacturers are so eager to incorporate the latest technology that they’re shipping products that feel more like beta tests than finished products. We’re the unwitting participants in a massive automotive experiment.
This is the paradox of progress. We’ve made cars simultaneously too smart and too stupid. They can recognize voice commands in 17 languages but can’t reliably hold a coffee cup. They update their software overnight but require a touchscreen tutorial to adjust the air conditioning. The future of automotive isn’t flying cars or self-charging highways. It’s about something simpler — finding the line between innovation and function. Between progress and common sense. Sometimes the best tech is the thing that just works. A button that clicks. A cup holder that holds.
For now, we’re stuck in automotive purgatory — over-engineered, underwhelming machines where driving feels more like managing a glitchy operating system than gripping the wheel.
The revolution arrived — broken, buggy, and half-baked. And those days when cars were just cars? They’re gone. For good. To those who roll their eyes and sneer at “nostalgia porn,” take a good look around. Not all innovation is an upgrade. Some things really were better a few decades ago — the movies, the music… and yes, the machines we drove.
READ MORE from John Mac Ghlionn:
While Trump Arms Ukraine, US Firms Arm Russia