THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 24, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
Matthew Omolesky


NextImg:The Obligations of Home: JD Vance and the Ordo Amoris

La humanidad es el único dios totalmente falso.

[Humanity is the only totally false god.]
— Nicolás Gómez Dávila
I
Imagine waking up from a coma, or returning from your rest-cure after a nasty bout with Influenza B, and finding the entire media ecosystem caught up in an acrimonious debate over some obscure Christian doctrine like Preterism or Monophysitism. Surely you would think you were still in the grip of a somnolent hallucination or bizarre fever dream. Yet that is essentially our reality, as the flame war over Vice President JD Vance’s reference to the Augustinian doctrine of ordo amoris (“order of love” or “order of charity”) enters its third week with no sign of dying down. Turn on CNN and you might encounter an utterly wet Passionist priest chastising the vice president for his theological stances. Browse the pages of Newsweek and you might find lefty journalists eagerly citing bizarre fringe figures like Joash Thomas, a self-styled “Masala Chai theologian,” who has apparently determined that Vance’s interpretation of the ordo amoris is “not a Christian concept; it’s a Western individualistic one,” as if those were necessarily at odds. And turn on Fox News and you might just catch Border Czar Tom Homan announcing that he has “harsh words for the pope.” What a time to be alive. Incredible things are happening in the Year of Our Lord 2025!
So much ink has been spilled over Vance’s forty-eight-word-long tweet, with the debate drawing in conservatives and nationalists, woke Catholics and leftwing journalists, globalists and effective altruists, and even the Supreme Pontiff himself, that I almost hesitate to add to a veritable flood of commentary. What is more, abstruse theological speculation is not the sort of thing I am particularly immense at, though I would never begrudge the contributions of various theologians and ecclesiastics past and present. For my part, I have always preferred to cast my lot with the likes of Nachman of Breslov, who in his Likutey Mo...

No hoodwinking or hornswoggling here.

Support independent journalism and get unlimited access to quality commentary.