THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 19, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
Aubrey Gulick


NextImg:The Nord Stream Pipeline Saga Is Straight Out of Hollywood

International incidents rarely play out like Hollywood action films — and when they do, the public usually doesn’t get to hear about it. But every once in a while, some journalist goes out and digs up the kind of story that Steven King might conjure up.

On Thursday, the Wall Street Journal published a lengthy investigative piece on the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage mystery. For those Americans who may have forgotten, in September 2022, an unknown someone set off an explosive that ruptured the twin pipelines usually used to pump natural gas from Russia to Europe. The result was that, on the eve of winter, Europe was faced with a potential energy crisis, and they weren’t happy about it. (READ MORE: Germany Halves 2025 Military Aid to Ukraine)

Putin blamed the CIA, the U.S. tried to stay out of the blame game, and Ukraine pointed fingers at the Kremlin. It was clear someone was lying, but it wasn’t obvious who. So Germany launched an investigation, and the Wall Street Journals Bojan Pancevski jumped right into the story. Two years later, it seems the explosion was a hair-brained scheme hatched on a late night in a Ukrainian bar. The story, as told by the Wall Street Journal, goes that President Volodymyr Zelensky knew of the plans and even approved them initially, but tried to call off the mission after the CIA caught wind of it. The operatives (some military, some private civilians) ignored him and went ahead with the scheme.

They boarded a borrowed 50-foot sailing yacht, the Andromeda, with a couple of professional divers and some explosives, and stopped over in Sandhamn, Sweden, briefly (where they were spotted by onlookers who noticed that the Andromeda was the only sailing ship sporting a Ukrainian flag). When the deed was done, the operatives rushed off the boat in Germany leaving behind DNA samples, fingerprints, and traces of explosives. (READ MORE: NATO Worried About Biden and Ukraine)

Pancevski asserts that he got his story from some of the operatives themselves and that it is corroborated by the results of the German investigation. It should be noted that Russia (which has publicly blamed the U.S. for the sabotage) has remained skeptical of that investigation. The trouble, for Kyiv, is that the German government is likely to believe its own investigation, and could pull some (or all) of its support for the beleaguered nation.

Tom Cruise could not have written a better script.

Saving the Pipeline in Tom Cruise Style

As you all know, this is a column about artificial intelligence, so you knew this was coming. I skipped asking ChatGPT anything. Any response from that quarter was going to be bland. Instead, I asked Elon Musk’s Grok to engage in some hypotheticals:

Prompt: If Tom Cruise wrote a screenplay based on the Nord Stream pipeline saga as reported by the Wall Street Journal, how would it end?

Grok: If Tom Cruise were to pen a screenplay based on the Nord Stream pipeline saga, with his penchant for high-octane action and a touch of Hollywood flair, here’s how it might end:

Title: The Pipeline Protocol
Act III: The Grand Finale
  • The Setup: Our protagonist, let’s call him Jack Reacher (because why not?), has been tracking the saboteurs across the Baltic Sea. He’s discovered that the Andromeda, a seemingly innocent yacht, was the key to the operation.
  • The Confrontation: In a scene that would make even the most seasoned viewers grip their armrests, Jack confronts the saboteurs on a stormy night. The yacht is rocking like a cradle in a hurricane, but Jack, with his impeccable timing and impossible balance, manages to leap from a speeding boat onto the yacht’s deck, all while the camera does a 360-degree spin around him for dramatic effect.
  • The Revelation: Amidst the chaos, it’s revealed that the saboteurs are not just any operatives but a mix of rogue agents from various intelligence agencies, each with their own motive, but united by a common goal of chaos. They’ve been using the pipeline as a pawn in a larger geopolitical game.
  • The Twist: Jack discovers that one of the saboteurs is actually an undercover agent from a neutral country, trying to prevent a larger war by exposing the plot. This agent has been feeding information to Jack, but now, they’re both in deep water, literally and figuratively.
  • The Climax: In a scene that could only be pulled off by Cruise, Jack uses his knowledge of underwater demolition to reverse the sabotage. He dives into the icy Baltic, dodging underwater drones and sharks (because why not add sharks?), to manually reset the explosives. The sequence is shot in one long take, showing his descent, the disarmament, and his ascent, all while holding his breath for what seems like an eternity.
  • The Resolution: As the sun rises, Jack emerges from the water, the pipelines are safe, and the saboteurs are apprehended by an international task force. But here’s where Cruise adds his signature twist: the real mastermind behind the plot was someone from within the energy sector, trying to manipulate gas prices. Jack, with his characteristic smirk, hands over a USB drive to the authorities, saying, “This should keep you busy for a while.”
  • The Ending: Jack walks away from the scene, not towards the camera but towards a waiting helicopter. As he lifts off, the camera pans down to show the Baltic Sea, now peaceful, with the pipelines intact, symbolizing the fragile peace in international waters.
  • The Final Shot: A close-up of Jack, looking out over the horizon, contemplating his next mission, perhaps thinking about the absurdity of humans fighting over gas lines in an ocean of water. The screen fades to black, but not before we hear Jack mutter, “Time to find a new hobby. Maybe knitting.”
This ending would encapsulate Cruise’s style: high stakes, personal heroics, a nod to the complexity of international politics, and a dash of humor, all while leaving the audience with a mix of awe and a chuckle at the absurdity of it all.
And here is where I turn to the audience. What do you think of the Wall Street Journal’s tale? Would you watch Grok’s film? Feel free to work it all out in the comments section below!

This is a weekly column at The American Spectator dedicated to exposing the left-wing bent of generative AI machines. If you enjoyed it and want to see what else ChatGPT or Grok comes up with, feel free to leave ideas for prompts in the comments section below!

Read More from the Fact-Check the Bot column: