America’s immigration system was designed to embody the American social contract — a compact between the individual and the state, in which the government is impartial and bound by law. But when newcomers arrive from societies where government is degraded into barter, bribery, and patronage, they import with them a radically different conception of what citizenship and authority mean. That is the real danger revealed in Louisiana, where Chandrakant “Lala” Patel, an Indian-origin businessman, now faces a 62-count federal indictment for orchestrating a sweeping U-visa fraud.
They are parables of how nations decay: not through sudden collapse but through the slow seep of alien civic ethics into their institutions.
Federal court records leave little doubt about the scale of corruption. From December 26, 2015, to at least July 15, 2025, prosecutors allege that Patel, a Louisiana convenience-store proprietor, conspired with four law enforcement officers to fabricate police reports in exchange for roughly $5,000 per individual. These reports falsely labeled non-residents as armed robbery victims, enabling them to apply for U-visas — a status intended only for genuine crime victims who aid law enforcement — through fraudulent USCIS Form I-918B certifications.
The indictment, handed down in July 2025, charges Patel with conspiracy to commit visa fraud, bribery, 24 counts of mail fraud, and eight counts of money laundering. Patel even secured a U-visa for himself in 2023 under these false pretenses. If convicted, he faces decades in prison and mandatory forfeiture of his ill-gotten gains. (RELATED: Five Quick Things: Mike Flynn, Epstein, Trump, and the Scandal-Blob)
In Massachusetts, a different Patel entirely — Rambhai Patel, 37, of New Jersey — was sentenced on August 22, 2025, in federal court in Boston for orchestrating a nationwide U-visa fraud conspiracy. Patel received 20 months and eight days in prison, followed by two years of supervised release, and was ordered to forfeit $850,000; he is also subject to deportation.
He had pleaded guilty in May 2025 to one count of conspiracy to commit visa fraud. Prosecutors said that from March 2023, Patel and his co-conspirator staged at least 18 fake armed robberies across the country — including five in Massachusetts — so that “victims” could apply for visas. One participant paid $20,000 for the chance to be a “victim.” At least two fraudulent U-visa applications were filed. The scheme earned Patel more than $850,000. Though distinct from the Louisiana case, it revealed the same corrosive logic: U.S. immigration documents were treated not as solemn safeguards but as tradable assets, paving a pathway toward citizenship emptied of its civic weight.
What the U-Visa Was Meant to Be
Created by Congress in 2000, the U-visa was meant to shield noncitizens who are victims of serious crimes such as trafficking, sexual assault, or domestic violence. In return for helping law enforcement prosecute offenders, applicants receive legal status for up to four years, with a path to permanent residency and citizenship.
The intent was noble: protect the vulnerable and strengthen prosecutions. Congress capped visas at 10,000 a year, but demand exploded. By 2023, there were more than 300,000 applications pending, with waits of over five years.
That backlog — combined with the life-changing benefits — turned the program into fertile ground for fraud. Certification on Form I-918B, where police confirm a crime occurred, became the point of abuse. In both the Louisiana and Boston schemes, false reports were filed, victims invented, and staged crimes were used to generate petitions. A 2019 DHS Inspector General report warned that the program was “susceptible to fraud,” citing weak verification and forged police paperwork. The Patels did not find a loophole — they exploited America’s assumption of trust.
Why It Matters
These figures reveal more than graft. They reflect a civic culture where authority is never trusted as impartial but bargained, bought, or bypassed. A licence, a passport, access to education, even welfare benefits — all are understood as items for sale under the table. In such systems, “rule of law” has little traction; the bazaar is the governing metaphor. When people raised in that environment migrate without embracing America’s civic creed, they import not just corruption but a disregard for the very processes that underpin American civic life.
For earlier generations of immigrants, American citizenship was the summit of aspiration, prized because it meant submitting to a higher civic order. For these offenders, it is something else entirely: a pawn in a game, a vehicle for schemes, a tool to be manipulated and discarded once its value is extracted. The U-visa became a ticket rack, police reports props in staged dramas.
A century ago, Theodore Roosevelt warned against “hyphenated Americanism” and insisted newcomers embrace one civic identity. Early 20th-century America demanded assimilation into its public norms. The Patel affairs prove why. A country cannot remain a republic of laws if it admits those who see law, residency, and even citizenship as commodities. The civic order cannot hold if those joining it refuse to abandon the ethics of the bazaar.
This is why the Patel cases matter. They are more than prosecutions; they are civic alarms. They are not just about a few businessmen or a handful of compromised actors. They are parables of how nations decay: not through sudden collapse but through the slow seep of alien civic ethics into their institutions. America’s immigration gate is not abstract. It is real, and today it is at risk of becoming a bazaar.
America must harden its immigration system against those who arrive with incompatible civic assumptions. Fraud must be punished, transparency enforced, assimilation demanded. Otherwise, the very value of American citizenship will keep eroding until the social contract itself dissolves into barter.
READ MORE from Kevin Cohen:
Denmark’s Hard Immigration Lesson — Data Over Illusions