Google has long denied accusations of political bias. But a growing body of evidence suggests the tech giant systematically buries conservative media, suppresses ideological diversity, and manipulates access to information. Internal documents, whistleblower accounts, and traffic audits all point to a disturbing pattern: Google uses its dominance to silence viewpoints it finds inconvenient. (RELATED: The Global Censorship Cancer)
One such document, obtained by the Daily Caller in 2019, reveals that Google maintains a file labeled deceptive news blacklist domains. This internal blacklist, approved by the company’s Trust & Safety team, targets sites deemed to violate Google’s “Good Neighbor” and “misrepresentation” policies. Among those targeted are The American Spectator, Gateway Pundit, and Conservative Tribune — sites with significant reach in conservative circles. (RELATED: Teachers Unions Utilize ‘NewsGuard’ to Censor Education)
“It’s always a technical problem — and almost always the technical problem hurts conservatives.”
The blacklist excludes those domains from Google’s Top Stories carousel, side panels, and other high-visibility features. That means even timely, fact-based reporting is unlikely to appear prominently — if at all — when users search for news. While the sites are not completely removed from search results, they are algorithmically sidelined, making them virtually invisible to the average user.
In sworn testimony back in 2018, the Google CEO assured lawmakers that the company does “not manually intervene on any particular search result.” But evidence suggests otherwise.
Whistleblower Zach Vorhies, a former Google engineer, released over 950 pages of internal documents in 2021 showing that Google not only tracks conservative content but uses algorithms and manual controls to suppress it. Another former engineer, Guillaume Chaslot, said the algorithms were designed to prioritize mainstream outlets and disadvantage non-establishment voices — particularly conservative ones.
Beyond whistleblower allegations, a 2016 peer-reviewed study by Harvard-trained psychologist Dr. Robert Epstein found that Google’s search algorithm displayed a measurable liberal bias during the presidential election — shifting at least 2.6 million votes in favor of Hillary Clinton among undecided voters. Epstein’s team conducted controlled experiments across multiple swing states, tracking how manipulated search suggestions and result placements influenced voter opinions without users realizing they were being influenced.
In 2024, a follow-up audit by media watchdog AllSides revealed that 65 percent of election-related Google search results were geographically mistargeted. In one example, users in Arizona were redirected to Pennsylvania-specific information, potentially creating confusion and suppressing access to locally relevant election data. The audit concluded that this systematic redirection benefited left-leaning narratives while limiting the reach of right-leaning sources, raising serious concerns about selective visibility and political manipulation.
Major conservative publishers such as Breitbart News, The Western Journal, and PJ Media have reported dramatic drops in organic search traffic following specific algorithm updates — some losing over 90 percent of their visibility overnight.
Breitbart, for instance, stated that Google referrals to its homepage fell from tens of thousands per day to virtually zero after a 2019 core algorithm change. In each case, Google either declined to comment or cited “routine adjustments,” offering no transparency.
Conservative content creators also describe being systematically targeted: videos demonetized without warning, articles labeled as “misinformation,” or links buried beneath pages of liberal-leaning sources. Google typically attributes these incidents to “technical bugs” or vague policy enforcement — yet these errors overwhelmingly appear to affect one side of the ideological spectrum.
As one interviewee told researchers, “It’s always a technical problem — and almost always the technical problem hurts conservatives.”
Google’s explanations do not hold up to scrutiny. The platform’s defenders claim content rankings are based on credibility, not ideology. But the selective targeting of right-leaning outlets — with no similar actions taken against liberal sources that promoted false narratives like the Trump-Russia collusion theory — suggests a political filter, not a neutral one.
While Google may seem like the only practical option, my research led me to discover Luxxle — a search engine launched in 2020 by a group of American engineers. Luxxle prioritizes user privacy and delivers balanced results, leaving editorial choices to users rather than algorithms.
Luxxle’s most notable feature is its Lenses tool, which allows users to toggle between left-leaning, right-leaning, and balanced news sources. A search for “tariffs,” for example, might return articles from Newsmax, the New York Post, and Reason, alongside the Hill, the L.A. Times, and the Conversation. The goal is transparency, not editorial control.
Crucially, Luxxle does not track users, build advertising profiles, or serve behavior-based ads. Instead, it delivers contextual ads that disappear after the session ends. The platform encourages users to adopt VPNs and privacy browsers — an approach that directly contrasts with Google’s data collection model.
While some have called Luxxle a “conservative search engine,” that label misses the point. Luxxle is not designed to favor any one political perspective. Instead, it is designed to remove bias — algorithmic or manual — and let users decide how they want to consume information.
Google controls nearly 90 percent of global search traffic. For many users, “Google” is synonymous with information itself. But that dominance comes at a cost — one increasingly paid by conservatives, independents, and anyone seeking media diversity. Luxxle is a necessary response to years of bias, blacklists, and misinformation labeled as neutrality.
READ MORE from Gregory Lyakhov:
Mamdani’s Victory Proves the Dems Have Abandoned Jews