Charlie Kirk was laid to rest on Sunday. His killer, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, has already been branded a “left-wing lunatic.” Understandably so: the fixation, the rhetoric, the transgender lover. But that label, while convenient, obscures more than it reveals. Robinson’s act cannot be tidied away with a partisan stamp. Behind the gun was more than warped ideology; it was something emptier and more corrosive: the black pill, the creed of nothingness.

Past extremists, deranged or deluded, still dreamed of a future. The Weather Underground spoke of liberation through bombs, convinced they were striking blows for justice. Ted Kaczynski, in his cabin, imagined himself a prophet of a world freed from technology’s grip. However perverse, these visions pointed beyond the act of violence itself. They sought to destroy in order to create, however wicked their creation might have been. The new breed rejects even that grim ambition. They are not trying to remake society but to prove that remaking is pointless. For them, destruction is not a step toward anything. If anything, it’s the destination. (RELATED: The Age of Spiritual Warfare Is Here. Will You Rise or Fall?)

That difference matters. Ideological killers treat violence like policy, a crude tool to push an agenda. This new strain treats violence like theology, a dire ritual meant to sanctify despair. It is a doctrine of negation: institutions are scams, hope a hoax, reform a farce, progress a fraud. If nothing holds, then taking life becomes an act of brutal clarity. The shooter’s rage is not fueled by a cause so much as by contempt for the very idea of cause. (RELATED: The Shameless Exploitation of Charlie Kirk’s Murder)

The decay does not stop with actions. It seeps into language, corrupting the common tongue. Words lose weight, definitions blur, and public debate becomes pointless. When meaning fades, “fascist” and “Nazi” are flung not with care but with careless abandon. This is more than ignorance. It is the natural outcome of a worldview that insists nothing has fixed value, not even the words meant to steady us. Once language breaks down, everything else soon follows. (RELATED: A New Psychosis Consuming America)

Where does the poison take root? Not in pulpits or think tanks but in feeds and comment threads, in anonymous corners where grievance festers into fury. Online forums that once offered solidarity now spread despair. Young men with steady disappointments — stalled careers, failed intimacies, fractured families — discover each other not in sports clubs or churches but in chat rooms that sharpen dejection into doctrine. Threads praise apathy, and memes glorify absence. (RELATED: AI Chatbots Are Not the Answer to Alleviating Loneliness for Young People)

These spaces matter because they remove friction. Real communities push back. They shame dangerous talk, they demand accountability, they tie a person to others. Digital echo chambers cut those ties. With likes and upvotes, cruelty becomes chic. With anonymity, cruelty finds company. Recruitment is not deliberate but viral: a single post, a clipped video, a chorus of jeers. The lonely are carried into the same dark current. (RELATED: Why Gen Z Is Giving Up on Sex, Love, and Each Other)

Philosophically, this is an old sickness with a new speed. Thinkers from Nietzsche to Camus warned of the modern slide toward emptiness. Today, that slide is supercharged. When the structures that once gave life meaning — work, faith, civic bonds — crumble, people face a vacuum. For some, it breeds cynicism. For a dangerous few, it breeds hatred. (RELATED: Charlie Kirk’s Assassination Exposes a Generation in Crisis)

The cultural damage runs deeper and wider than headlines admit. Even those who never touch a weapon are shaped by its shadow. Sneering passes for intelligence. Scorn becomes status. Empathy is dismissed as weakness. A generation trades irony for indifference, mockery for meaning. Slowly, the muscle of self-rule shrinks. Democracy does not only die to bullets. It dies when people stop believing their voices matter.

So, I ask, what must be done? First, we must stop packaging every act of violence as a tidy partisan story. That reflex comforts editors but misleads the public. We need to dig deeper into the conditions that steer people toward surrender. That means funding mental-health programs that actually reach young men, expanding vocational paths that restore dignity to work, and rebuilding institutions that foster real belonging: apprenticeships, parish halls, union chapters that are lifelines, not punchlines. (RELATED: Not Everyone Needs a Therapist. Some Just Need a Job.)

Second, communities online and off must change the incentives. Platforms must face the consequences of the economies they have engineered — attention that rewards outrage, algorithms that amplify antagonism. Moderation will always be messy, but monetizing misery is moral abdication. What we need is steadier standards and clear off-ramps for those already edging toward fatalism.

Finally, we must reclaim the language of meaning. Hope is not sentiment but discipline. Responsibility is not oppression but the only proper antidote to emptiness. When language falls apart, nothing is safe. If we do not insist that life is worth something, in policy, in culture, in the rituals that bind people to purpose, the creed of nothing will continue to spread.

Grief is the first duty. Repair is the next. If we take both seriously, Charlie Kirk’s passing can become the beginning of a safer, saner future.

READ MORE from John Mac Ghlionn:

Meet the Digital Priestess of a Post-Human State

Jimmy Kimmel’s Pious Death Spiral

The Age of Spiritual Warfare Is Here. Will You Rise or Fall?