For if the evidence of the unfair advantage is as clear as the evidence of the biological differences between men and women, then why is this form of cheating acceptable?

EP. 34: William Bock former 13-year tenure as general counsel for the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, lead attorney in the investigation of Lance Armstrong and other members of the U.S. Cycling Team, and former NCAA Infractions Committee.

Presented by AMERICAN GREATNESS and <a href="https://www.restorationofamerica.com/restoration-news/">RESTORATION NEWS</a>

<a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/dan-proft-counterculture-presented-by-american-greatness/id1709598248">Apple</a>

<a href="https://open.spotify.com/show/6FdQYNEHskImobHpiH8Fxb?si=bf27ca3439814c05"> Spotify</a>

<a href="https://rumble.com/c/AmericanGreatness"> Rumble</a>

For if the evidence of the unfair advantage is as clear as the evidence of the biological differences between men and women, then why is this form of cheating acceptable?{ai:summary}<p>William Bock, former general counsel for USADA, talks about unfair advantage in sports and the investigation of Lance Armstrong. A gritty look at doping in professional cycling. #sports</p>

William Bock - Dan Proft Counterculture Episode 34

Loading...