As the Russia–Ukraine war enters its fourth year, the toll of devastation continues to mount. Over half a million lives have been lost or permanently altered, with millions more displaced. By 2027, the projected cost of rebuilding Ukraine is expected to surpass $486 billion¹—a figure that underscores the immense human and economic impact of this prolonged conflict.
Born in Kyiv, Ukraine, during the Soviet era, I feel a deep connection to the country of my birth and am perplexed by the senseless, genocidal escalation of war in Ukraine. Yet behind the scenes of this irrational conflict lies a less visible reality: war, despite its horrors, is remarkably profitable for a wide array of industries, politicians, and financiers.
From medieval armorers inflating prices during crusades to 20th-century arms manufacturers exploiting global conflicts, people have long leveraged war for financial gain. During World War II, companies like IG Farben and Ford were implicated in profiting from Nazi Germany’s war machine. The military-industrial complex that President Eisenhower warned about in 1961 has since evolved into a transnational network of private contractors, arms dealers, and lobbyists who thrive in times of conflict.
Profiting from Conflict
The beneficiaries of this conflict extend beyond the front lines—the theater of war. America’s largest defense contractors—Lockheed Martin (where my father worked as an engineer for many years), Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman—have experienced unprecedented financial gains since the war’s onset. In the fiscal year 2023 alone, Lockheed Martin secured a staggering $70.8 billion in contracts from the Pentagon², and collectively, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman received $92 billion, bringing the total for these top five defense firms to over $162 billion in a single year².
These companies redistributed approximately $57 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks since 2022³.
The surge in defense spending has not only bolstered these firms’ financial fortunes but also driven up the costs of weaponry under the pretext of wartime urgency. For instance, the price of a Stinger missile has skyrocketed from $25,000 to $400,000 each⁴. Similarly, the cost of a Javelin missile, jointly produced by Lockheed and Raytheon, surged by nearly 33% between 2021 and 2024⁴.
Beyond arms sales, political influence and lobbying have surged. Since 2022, the top five defense contractors have collectively spent $251 million on lobbying efforts⁵, with over $37 million directed towards federal campaigns, particularly those of defense committee members⁵.
Meanwhile, amidst the chaos in Ukraine, sanctioned Russian oligarchs, criminal kingpins, and politically connected figures have capitalized on the war’s disruption. Figures like Pavel Fuks and former MP Vitaliy Khomutynnik have amassed significant real estate holdings in bombed-out Ukrainian cities, such as Kharkiv, Dnipro, and Zaporizhzhia⁶. Using Cyprus-based shell companies, such as Fuks-linked “Northern Star Holdings,” they position themselves for lucrative post-war reconstruction contracts funded by international entities, including the EU and the World Bank.⁷
Cryptocurrencies & Geopolitical Exploitation
The economic fallout of sanctions on Russia has led to a massive influx of wealth into cryptocurrencies, with an estimated $15–20 billion transferred through offshore exchanges and anonymous wallets from 2022 to 2024⁸. Major exchanges, such as Binance, facilitated substantial transfers from both Russian and Ukrainian entities⁹, leveraging cryptocurrencies like Tether (USDT) on platforms like TRON and Ethereum to evade traditional banking restrictions, including SWIFT⁹.
The cryptocurrency boom also saw the rise of crypto mixers and over-the-counter brokers, charging high fees for transactions. In Ukraine, innovative uses of blockchain technology, such as NFTs and DeFi protocols, were utilized for military fundraising efforts, though often lacking in transparent financial reporting¹⁰.
And while humanitarian aid remains crucial, reports from the European Court of Auditors in 2024 highlighted concerns regarding the allocation of over €1.2 billion in aid without competitive bidding¹¹. Similarly, USAID awarded contracts totaling over $300 million to firms such as Chemonics, DAI Global, and AECOM under opaque circumstances that ranged from civil society enhancement to logistical support¹². These projects faced allegations of cost inflation, nepotism, and non-competitive extensions.
The war’s geopolitical impacts extend beyond the military and financial spheres. Europe’s accelerated transition away from Russian energy sources has benefited LNG exporters, such as Shell and QatarEnergy, which have gained billions by replacing Russian gas in European markets¹⁸. Moreover, disruptions in the Ukrainian and Russian mining sectors elevated global prices for essential minerals like lithium, cobalt, and nickel by 45–70%²⁰.
Politically, the war has empowered leaders across affected nations, granting emergency powers, extended budgets, and prolonged political tenures. In Ukraine, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s administration utilized martial law to consolidate control over reconstruction efforts and delay scheduled elections¹³. Conversely, in the U.S., bipartisan support for military initiatives facilitated unprecedented defense budgets with minimal congressional oversight¹⁴. In Russia, President Putin capitalized on the war to suppress dissent, enhance surveillance, and bolster state propaganda efforts¹⁵.
Meanwhile, advancements in surveillance technology and information warfare have also played pivotal roles in the conflict. Companies like Palantir and Ukrainian startups like Molfar have monetized their expertise in AI-driven intelligence tools for military applications¹⁶. Palantir, for instance, secured a long-term contract with Ukraine’s Digital Ministry to enhance battlefield analysis using AI technologies¹⁶. Similarly, Molfar’s OSINT tools were deployed for tracking adversaries, identifying disinformation campaigns, and even profiling civilians¹⁷. These technologies, branded as “Ukraine-proven,” are increasingly marketed to NATO allies, turning war experience into lucrative software-as-a-service ventures.
The war in Ukraine has become a business model for a diverse array of actors, from defense contractors and oligarchs to tech firms. While some entities and people profit directly from arms sales and reconstruction contracts, others capitalize on economic sanctions, cryptocurrencies, and blurred aid flows. Their actions are often veiled in virtue signaling and corporate best practices, only to conceal depraved war profiteering. This underscores a disturbing reality: war, far from being a humanitarian catastrophe, has evolved into a complex economic and political ecosystem—a system in which incentives quietly align to perpetuate conflict and profit from its chaos.
This is not a conspiracy but a reality of our times. More than ever, war has become a profitable enterprise, perpetuating human suffering and geopolitical instability.
Yuri Vanetik is an attorney, GOP strategist, and Lincoln Fellow at the Claremont Institute. He is a subject matter expert on Eastern European politics. He lives in Newport Beach, California.
Footnotes & Citations
- World Bank Ukraine Reconstruction Report, May 2024
- U.S. Department of Defense Contracts Archive, FY2023
- Lockheed Martin, RTX, Boeing Annual Shareholder Reports, 2022–24
- GAO Weapons Cost Review, 2024; DefenseNews Javelin/Patriot analysis
- OpenSecrets.org, Defense Lobbying Tracker, 2022–2025
- NABU Case Files on Pavel Fuks, Kyiv Post investigations, Oct–Nov 2024
- Ukrainian Land Registry Exposés, Bihus.Info, Feb 2025
- Chainalysis Crypto Sanctions Report, 2023
- Binance & TRON Blockchain Data, via Nansen Analytics, 2022–2024
- Elliptic: Crypto Funding of Ukraine Military, 2023
- European Court of Auditors Audit: “Ukraine Emergency Funds,” 2024
- USAID Contracting Database: Ukraine Emergency Projects, 2022–2024
- Rada Resolution No. 3206: Martial Law Extension, Dec 2024
- Congressional Budget Office: FY2025 Defense Authorization Bill
- OSCE Reports on Russian Political Repression, 2023–25
- Palantir Press Release, April 2023
- Molfar OSINT Case Studies, 2023–2024
- BP, Shell Annual Reports; IEA Energy Outlook 2023
- EU ETS Market Performance, Carbon Pulse, June 2024
- BloombergNEF: Rare Earth Commodity Data, March 2024
- “The Rise of Telegram Warlords,” Wired Magazine, Jan 2024
- ISW and CSIS Donor Disclosures, 2023
- EU DisinfoLab, AI Fake Influencer Report, April 2025