Doesn't the timing of the arrest of the FBI informant giving witness about the Bidens and their corrupt activities seem suspect?
According to the Associated Press:
Alexander Smirnov [allegedly] falsely reported to the FBI in June 2020 that executives associated with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma paid Hunter and Joe Biden $5 million each in 2015 or 2016, prosecutors said in an indictment. Smirnov told his handler that an executive claimed to have hired Hunter Biden to “protect us, through his dad, from all kinds of problems,” according to court documents.
Of course, the media has no questions because they are cheering.
The media buried the story of the Hunter Biden laptop before the 2020 election and have had little to no interest in all the kickbacks indicated within its contents to Hunter and Jim Biden.
They haven't had any interest in all the shell companies described, nor how the money flows to nine Biden family members, including grandchildren. No matter how many times they have seen indicators of Joe's involvement with business associates, they continue with the talking points that there is no evidence that Joe knew of, was involved, or benefitted from, the kickbacks described in Hunter's laptop, from around the world.
So here are a few questions that should be asked by the media but won't be because their main interest has always been to protect and reelect Biden or some other Democrat.
When did the FBI receive the document from the informant about the bribery since the bribery accusation was from eight or nine years ago?
When did the investigation of the document begin and end? Why wasn't the public told that it was a lie as soon as the allegation came out instead of waiting until after an impeachment inquiry started? Doesn't that seem suspicious since they have had the document for years?
How much has the FBI paid thie informant since he has been a reliable informant since 2010? When did they stop using him as an informant?
And here are a couple questions about another person who gave the FBI false information:
Why didn't the FBI arrest Christopher Steele for giving them a fake dossier to try to destroy Trump. After all, they offered him $1 million if he could prove it was true.
According to CNN:
Why did the FBI continue to use the Steele dossier as a justification to spy and do the Mueller investigation when they knew it was false?
This is from Sen. Charles Grassley's website:
WASHINGTON – Despite multiple reports in 2017 warning that claims in an anti-Trump dossier were “false” and “part of a Russian disinformation campaign,” the FBI continued to rely on the Democrat-funded opposition research to spy on a Trump campaign aide.